Unit 6 Review 2024

Front

What claim is supported by the excerpt? Options: President Jackson can call on the army to relocate the Cherokee. Congress should enact laws to add new states to the Union. South Carolina cannot nullify a federal law it disagrees with. Americans should move out west after the Louisiana Purchase.

Back

South Carolina cannot nullify a federal law it disagrees with.

Front

Which statement provides evidence for the answer to Part A? Options: “…the honorable gentleman from South Carolina…”, …”any State government can cancel an act of the General Government, which it deems unconstitutional.”, “The people have declared that this constitution…”, “The Supreme Court alone could declare a law to be unconstitutional; no
state could do that.”

Back

“The Supreme Court alone could declare a law to be unconstitutional; no
state could do that.”

Front

Which event best replaces the question mark? Options: The Nullification Crisis takes place. Cherokee are relocated west of the Mississippi. The abolition movement gains support. Americans rush to find gold in California.

Back

Cherokee are relocated west of the Mississippi.

Front

When was there first an increase in the levels of U.S. voter participation?

Back

During the election of Andrew Jackson

Front

This work displayed, as well as similar works, would have been created by artists associated with the –

Back

Hudson River School

Front

Which of the following events best replaces the question mark?
Battle of New Orleans,
Treaty of Ghent,
XYZ Affair,
Trail of Tears

Back

Trail of Tears

Front

Why did the Anti-Federalists demand that a bill of rights be added to the U.S. Constitution?

Back

To protect individual freedoms from the federal government.

Front

What was one effect of these events on the 1828 presidential election?

Back

Voter participation increased.

Front

In the court case Worcester v. Georgia, John Marshall ruled

Back

The president could not force Natives off of their lands

Front

In this reply, Daniel Webster is reacting to -

Back

an attempted nullification of a federal law by a state.