Front

SOGA 1957 operates against the background of

Back

Law of contract

Front

Which of the following is NOT considered 'goods' under SOGA 1957? Stock and shares, Growing crops, Actionable claims, Chattels

Back

Actionable claims

Front

In the case of Underwood v Burgh Castle Brick and Cement, was the engine considered to be in a deliverable state?

Back

No

Front

In Penta Continental Land v Chung Kwok Restaurants, were the air conditioning units considered fixtures?

Back

No

Front

Fill in the blank: An example of an actionable claim is ________

Back

Debts

Front

In Central Securities Holdings Bhd v Haron, the Federal Court applied SOGA in a dispute involving: Land, Intellectual property rights, Sale of shares, Equitable interests

Back

Sale of shares

Front

"Fructus industriales" are best described as: Annual crops obtained by yearly labor and cultivation

Back

Annual crops obtained by yearly labor and cultivation

Front

In Lee v Griffin, the court held that a contract to make and deliver a chattel is:

Back

A contract for the sale of goods

Front

In Robinson v Graves, the contract to paint a portrait was held to be:

Back

A contract for work and labor

Front

A contract for the construction or renovation of a land structure is generally considered:

Back

A contract for work and materials