Bribery and Related Crimes

Front

What were the crimes involved in this case? Options: Bribery, False Pretenses, Forgery & Uttering; Bribery, False Pretenses, Forgery & Uttering, Theft; Bribery, False Pretenses, Fraud;

Back

Bribery, False Pretenses, Forgery & Uttering

Front

Which is not a piece of evidence? A doctored SAT report submitted to the college., Emails between Jessica and the consultant discussing the “guarantee” of admission.,

• Bank transfer records showing a $50,000 payment to the consultant labeled “college services.”
  
  

, A whistleblower report from another board member who noticed discrepancies in the financial records.

Back

A whistleblower report from another board member who noticed discrepancies in the financial records.

Front

Which is an element of Bribery? Options: The perpetrator must take and carry away the property of another. A request or receipt by the official, or an offer or promise to the official, of that thing of value A certain signature or writing was falsely made or altered And thereby inducing the owner to part with both possession of and title to the property

Back

A request or receipt by the official, or an offer or promise to the official, of that thing of value

Front

Which is not an element of False Pretenses? The making of a material misinterpretation of fact, With intent to deceive or defraud the owner of the property, And thereby inducing the owner to part with both possession of and title to the property, The defendant must have knowingly joined the charged...and intended to help accomplish its objectives 

Back

The defendant must have knowingly joined the charged...and intended to help accomplish its objectives .

Front

Which is the correct order of events?

1. Bribery of CA Consultant, SAT scores forgery, Son’s under performance (despite being a “state champion”), Internal audit flagged discrepancies

,

1. Bribery of CA Consultant, Son’s under performance (despite being a “state champion”), Internal audit flagged discrepancies

,

1. SAT scores forgery, Son’s under performance (despite being a “state champion”), Internal audit flagged discrepancies

,

1. Bribery of CA Consultant, SAT scores forgery, Internal audit flagged discrepancies, Son’s under performance (despite being a “state champion”)

Back

Bribery of CA Consultant, SAT scores forgery, Son’s under performance (despite being a “state champion”), Internal audit flagged discrepancies