LAWS 203 - preliminary agreements

LAWS 203 - preliminary agreements

Assessment

Flashcard

English

KG

Hard

Created by

Abdullah Zahid

FREE Resource

Student preview

quiz-placeholder

12 questions

Show all answers

1.

FLASHCARD QUESTION

Front

What is a preliminary agreement?

Back

Preliminary agreements are when the parties are negotiating processes i reaching for the ultimate contract, but in that process, the parties reach a preliminary agreement. However, this preliminary agreement implies that the parties are intending for there to be a subsequent contract (the ultimate agreement).

2.

FLASHCARD QUESTION

Front

What was the traditional approach to preliminary agreements? Explain using case law.

Back

In the case of Carruthers, the court held that because there was clear language in the contract, indicating that the contract will not be binding until it is formally agreed to, anything short of the signing of a formal contract would not lead to a legally binding contract.

3.

FLASHCARD QUESTION

Front

How has the traditional approach to preliminary agreements been further accentuated by case law?

Back

In the case of Ecles, the court held that a contract only becomes binding on the parties, if and when, the method in which they intend to be bound, is executed. This manner may depend on the facts of each unique case or it may be the method that was in the minds of the parties, and their solicitors, from the beginning. That 'method' may have been the ordinary, customary or convenient means of exchange.

4.

FLASHCARD QUESTION

Front

How has this traditional approach to preliminary agreements been overulled?

Back

In the case of France the court held that preliminary agreements, can be legally enforceable, if it can be proved, after arguing for both sides, that there was an intention to be legally bound by the preliminary agreement.

5.

FLASHCARD QUESTION

Front

What were the arguments against the parties intentions to be legally bound by the preliminary agreement in the case of France?

Back

The fact that a term within the contract stated that the parties would only be bound if and when a formal, documented agreement had been reached/signed, and the fact that some terms in the contract were not agreed to and so were expressly reserved to be decided upon/ agreed to in future circumstances.

6.

FLASHCARD QUESTION

Front

What were the arguments in favor of the parties intentions to be legally bound by the preliminary agreement in the case of France?

Back

The fact that the letter referred to our agreement, not subsequent agreement, the fact that some of the terms in the contract, seemed to envisage the offeree acting immediately, the fact that the letter also conveyed that the preliminary agreement is already effective, the fact that the agreement seemed to be quite detailed, and the fact that the letter ended with the statement that by entering into this agreement, the offeree would have attained a massive financial benefit.

7.

FLASHCARD QUESTION

Front

What did the court ultimately hold in the case of France?

Back

The court ultimately held that the parties intended to be bound by the preliminary agreement.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?

Discover more resources for English