Enhancing Engagement and Data Collection with Tech Platforms

Poll

How often do you integrate educational technology gamification platforms (e.g., Kahoot, Quizizz, Blooket, Gimkit) into your lessons?

• Daily

• A few times a week

• Once a week

• Monthly

• Rarely

Poll

Which objective most aligns with your reason for choosing the Enhancing Engagement and Data Collection with Tech Platforms session?

• Understand the benefits of using technology platforms in the classroom

• Compare the features, pros, and cons of Quizizz, Nearpod, and Kahoot.

• Learn how to use these platforms for engagement, data collection, and remediation.

Poll

Which reason for using tech platforms is your highest priority?

• Data

• Save Time

• Remediation

• Engagement

Poll

What is your overall perception of Kahoot as an educational tool, considering its features and limitations?

• Highly Positive: Highly positive: Kahoot is an excellent tool because it is engaging, competitive, and easy to use for group activities.

• Somewhat Positive: Positive: Kahoot is great for engagement and customization, but its focus on live quizzes might not suit all teaching scenarios.

• Neutral: Kahoot is good for some purposes, like icebreakers, but its lack of in-depth analytics and limited self-paced options are drawbacks.

• Somewhat Negative: Negative: Kahoot’s focus on engagement over analytics and limited self-paced functionality makes it less effective for deeper learning needs.

• Negative: Highly negative: Kahoot’s limitations, including its lack of comprehensive features like other tools, outweigh its benefits.

Poll

What is your overall perception of Kahoot as an educational tool, considering its features and limitations?

• Highly Positive: Highly positive: Kahoot is an excellent tool because it is engaging, competitive, and easy to use for group activities.

• Somewhat Positive: Positive: Kahoot is great for engagement and customization, but its focus on live quizzes might not suit all teaching scenarios.

• Neutral: Kahoot is good for some purposes, like icebreakers, but its lack of in-depth analytics and limited self-paced options are drawbacks.

• Somewhat Negative: Negative: Kahoot’s focus on engagement over analytics and limited self-paced functionality makes it less effective for deeper learning needs.

• Negative: Highly negative: Kahoot’s limitations, including its lack of comprehensive features like other tools, outweigh its benefits.

Poll

What is your overall perception of Kahoot as an educational tool, considering its features and limitations?

• Highly Positive: Highly positive: Kahoot is an excellent tool because it is engaging, competitive, and easy to use for group activities.

• Somewhat Positive: Positive: Kahoot is great for engagement and customization, but its focus on live quizzes might not suit all teaching scenarios.

• Neutral: Kahoot is good for some purposes, like icebreakers, but its lack of in-depth analytics and limited self-paced options are drawbacks.

• Somewhat Negative: Negative: Kahoot’s focus on engagement over analytics and limited self-paced functionality makes it less effective for deeper learning needs.

• Negative: Highly negative: Kahoot’s limitations, including its lack of comprehensive features like other tools, outweigh its benefits.