Dollar Diplomacy and Moral Diplomacy - Unit 5

Multiple Choice

Why was the concept of 'Dollar Diplomacy' significant in the context of U.S. imperialism in Latin America?

• It promoted military intervention over economic investment.

• It encouraged U.S. businesses to invest in Latin American countries, increasing American influence.

• It focused solely on moral principles without economic interests.

• It discouraged any form of U.S. involvement in Latin America.

Multiple Select

Which of the following were consequences of U.S. economic intervention in Central America?

• Created economic dependency

• Increased U.S. influence in the region

• Strengthened local governments

• Reduced foreign influence

Multiple Choice

Which of the following best describes the difference between dollar diplomacy and moral diplomacy?

• Dollar diplomacy focused on economic influence, while moral diplomacy emphasized promoting democratic values.

• Dollar diplomacy was used only in Europe, while moral diplomacy was used in Latin America.

• Moral diplomacy relied on military intervention, while dollar diplomacy did not.

• Dollar diplomacy was a policy of President Wilson, while moral diplomacy was a policy of President Taft.

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was a direct result of Pancho Villa's attack on Columbus, New Mexico in 1916?

• The United States declared war on Mexico

• General Pershing was sent with 10,000 troops to pursue Villa

• Villa was captured and executed

• The Carranza government was overthrown

Match

Match the following presidents to their respective policies

• Theodore Roosevelt

• William Taft

• Woodrow Wilson

"Big Stick" Diplomacy

Dollar Diplomacy

Moral Diplomacy

• "Big Stick" Diplomacy

• Dollar Diplomacy

• Moral Diplomacy