
Information, Argument, and Persuasion
Authored by Tiffany Estes
English
6th - 7th Grade
Used 12+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
7 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
15 mins • 1 pt
In the editorial, "Pro Athletes' Salaries Aren't Overly Exorbitant" you can immediately identify the author's claim just by reading the title. Choose the best statement that paraphrases the claim of the author.
Pro athletes get paid too much.
Pro athletes get paid just right.
The salaries of pro athletes is fair.
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What over generalization does Singletary make in lines 10-13?
"professional sports will fail"
"the players are selfish"
"professional sports will have to be restructured"
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Reread lines 64-69. Do you think Singletary's statement is a single-cause fallacy?
Yes, his statement is a single-cause fallacy because fans might want to go to the game for other reasons besides to see the players.
No, Singletary's statement is not a single-cause fallacy. why else would people go to a baseball game?
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
In the article, "Do Professional Athletes Get Paid Too Much?
"Athletes have always made a lot of money" -- that's the argument Hjelm anticipates in lines 6-21. What is his counter argument?
Hjelm's counter argument is that "...even role players in professional sports are pulling in an exorbitant amount of money."
Hjelm's counter argument is that star athletes have always earned a lot of money, but he says that today even substitute players make ten times more than the average worker.
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Reread lines 33-38. What is Hjelm's claim about the salaries of the professional athletes?
His claim is that "sports are entertainment."
His claim is that "Entertainment is a necessary thing..."
His claim is that "athletes are paid far too much for simply playing games."
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
How does Hjelm support the claim that you chose in the last question?
Hjelm supports his claim by comparing the 7 figure salaries of entertainers to the salaries of teachers, firefighters, and police officers who make 1 percent of this.
Hjelm supports his claim by explaining that fans pay to see athletes perform at a high level.
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Reread lines 77-82. What overgeneralization does Hjelm make about professional athletes?
The overgeneralization that Hjelm makes is when he says, "Also troubling are the egos of the athletes..."
The overgeneralization the Hjelm makes is when he says, "players were crying poverty."
The overgeneralization that Hjelm makes is when he says, "they have no ability to relate to the public."
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?