Search Header Logo

Information, Argument, and Persuasion

Authored by Tiffany Estes

English

6th - 7th Grade

Used 12+ times

Information, Argument, and Persuasion
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

In the editorial, "Pro Athletes' Salaries Aren't Overly Exorbitant" you can immediately identify the author's claim just by reading the title.  Choose the best statement that paraphrases the claim of the author.

Pro athletes get paid too much.
Pro athletes get paid just right.
The salaries of pro athletes is fair.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

What over generalization does Singletary make in lines 10-13? 

"professional sports will fail"
"the players are selfish"
"professional sports will have to be restructured"

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

Reread lines 64-69.  Do you think Singletary's statement is a single-cause fallacy?

Yes, his statement is a single-cause fallacy because fans might want to go to the game for other reasons besides to see the players.
No, Singletary's statement is not a single-cause fallacy.  why else would people go to a baseball game?

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

In the article, "Do Professional Athletes Get Paid Too Much?
"Athletes have always made a lot of money" --   that's the argument Hjelm anticipates in lines 6-21.  What is his counter argument?

Hjelm's counter argument is that "...even role players in professional sports are pulling in an exorbitant amount of money."
Hjelm's counter argument is that star athletes have always earned a lot of money, but he says that today even substitute players make ten times more than the average worker.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

Reread lines 33-38.  What is Hjelm's claim about the salaries of the professional athletes?

His claim is that "sports are entertainment."
His claim is that "Entertainment is a necessary thing..."
His claim is that "athletes are paid far too much for simply playing games."

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

How does Hjelm support the claim that you chose in the last question?

Hjelm supports his claim by comparing the 7 figure salaries of entertainers to the salaries of teachers, firefighters, and police officers who make 1 percent of this.
Hjelm supports his claim by explaining that fans pay to see athletes perform at a high level.  

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

Reread lines 77-82.  What overgeneralization does Hjelm make about professional athletes?

The overgeneralization that Hjelm makes is when he says, "Also troubling are the egos of the athletes..."
The overgeneralization the Hjelm makes is when he says, "players were crying poverty."
The overgeneralization that Hjelm makes is when he says, "they have no ability to relate to the public."

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?