Gross Negligence Manslaughter

Which case set out the test for Gross Negligence Manslaughter? 

• Adomako (1994) 
• Bateman (1925) 
• R. Misra v. R. Srivastava (2004) 
• Singh (1999) 

What is the first element of the test? 

• Negligence must be gross. 
• The Duty must breached. 
• There must be a Duty of Care
• Negligence Must carry a risk of death

Which case concerned a landlord who failed in his duty of maintain his properties? 

• Adomako (1994) 
• Bateman (1925) 
• R. Misra v. R. Srivastava (2004) 
• Singh (1999) 

Which case established that D has a duty not to create a life threatening situation? 

• Adomako (1994) 
• Bateman (1925) 
• R. Misra v. R. Srivastava (2004) 
• Evans (2009) 

Which case established that ship captains owe a duty of care to their crew? 

• Litchfield (1998) 
• Bateman (1925) 
• R. Misra v. R. Srivastava (2004) 
• Evans (2009) 

Which case established that D could owe V a duty of care even when undertaking an illegal activity? 

• Litchfield (1998) 
• Wacker (2002) 
• R. Misra v. R. Srivastava (2004) 
• Evans (2009) 

Which case established the case for whether negligence is 'gross'? 

• Bateman (1925) 
• Stone and Dobinson (1977)
• Dias (2002)
• Willoughby (2005)

What is the test for whether negligence is 'gross'? 

• It meets criteria set out in the Criminal and Justice Act (2009)
• The Reasonable man would deem it to be gross.
• When it constitutes an Illegal Act.
• When it goes ‘beyond a matter of mere compensation between subjects and showed such disregard for the life and safety of others as to amount to a crime against the State and conduct deserving of punishment’. 

Who makes the decision as to whether the negligence is gross? 

• The Jury 
• The Judge
• An Advocate General
• An Angry Mob

What must there be a risk of for gross negligence manslaughter to be applied? 

• The 'Health and Wellbeing of D' 
• Serious Injury 
• Death
• A slight wound