AP Language Chapter 3 Test

AP Language Chapter 3 Test

9th - 12th Grade

36 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Fallacious Reasoning/Logical Fallacy

Fallacious Reasoning/Logical Fallacy

10th Grade

40 Qs

Quiz on Claims, Arguments, and Rhetorical Appeals

Quiz on Claims, Arguments, and Rhetorical Appeals

9th Grade

32 Qs

Elements of Argument Review

Elements of Argument Review

12th Grade - University

35 Qs

Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies

Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies

9th - 12th Grade

36 Qs

Propaganda Test QZ

Propaganda Test QZ

11th Grade

36 Qs

Unit 1 Test Review

Unit 1 Test Review

11th - 12th Grade

31 Qs

Debate language

Debate language

10th Grade - Professional Development

31 Qs

Fallacious Reasoning

Fallacious Reasoning

12th Grade - University

36 Qs

AP Language Chapter 3 Test

AP Language Chapter 3 Test

Assessment

Quiz

English

9th - 12th Grade

Medium

CCSS
RI.8.8, RI.9-10.5, RI.9-10.8

+19

Standards-aligned

Created by

Carrie Reading

Used 17+ times

FREE Resource

36 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Five part argument structure used by rhetoricians:

Claim of value

Circular reasoning

Classical oration

Logical fallacy

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.8

CCSS.W.9-10.1

CCSS.W.9-10.1A

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Thesis that does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay:

Closed thesis

Ad hominem

Open thesis

Reservation

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it in a way that is accommodating rather than alienating.

Rogerian arguments

Refutation

First hand evidence

Classical oration

Tags

CCSS.SL.9-10.1D

CCSS.W.9-10.1A

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Also called an assertion or proposition. It states the argument’s main idea or position.

Straw man

Claim

Assumption

Ad hominem

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Logical process whereby the writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion, which is also called a generalization.

Assumption

syllogism

Induction

Warrant

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Also known as the bandwagon appeal, this fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to “everybody’s doing it, so it must be a good thing to do.” - Ad Populum

True

False

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Warrant- In the Toulmin model, this consists of further assurances or data without which the assumption lacks authority.

True

False

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?