Search Header Logo

AP Language Chapter 3 Test

Authored by Carrie Reading

English

9th - 12th Grade

CCSS covered

Used 25+ times

AP Language Chapter 3 Test
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

About

This quiz comprehensively assesses students' mastery of Advanced Placement Language and Composition rhetorical analysis concepts, making it appropriate for grades 11-12. The questions test students' understanding of argumentative structures, particularly classical oration and the Toulmin model of argument, along with extensive coverage of logical fallacies and types of evidence. Students must demonstrate knowledge of formal argumentation terminology including claims, warrants, qualifiers, and reservations, as well as distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning processes. The quiz also evaluates students' ability to identify and categorize various logical fallacies in both theoretical definitions and practical applications through visual examples, requiring them to apply their understanding of concepts like ad hominem attacks, false dilemmas, hasty generalizations, and post hoc reasoning to real-world scenarios. Created by Carrie Reading, an English teacher in the US who teaches grades 9-12. This assessment serves as an excellent summative evaluation tool following instruction on rhetorical analysis and argumentative writing techniques fundamental to AP Language coursework. The quiz functions effectively as a chapter test to measure student comprehension before moving to more complex rhetorical analysis tasks, and can also be adapted for review sessions prior to AP examinations or as a diagnostic tool to identify areas requiring additional reinforcement. Teachers can utilize individual sections for targeted practice on specific concepts like the Toulmin model or logical fallacies, making it versatile for both formative and summative assessment purposes. This quiz aligns with Common Core standards CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.11-12.8 for evaluating reasoning and evidence in texts, and CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.11-12.1 for writing arguments to support claims in an analysis using valid reasoning and relevant evidence.

    Content View

    Student View

36 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Five part argument structure used by rhetoricians:

Claim of value

Circular reasoning

Classical oration

Logical fallacy

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.8

CCSS.W.9-10.1

CCSS.W.9-10.1A

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Thesis that does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay:

Closed thesis

Ad hominem

Open thesis

Reservation

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it in a way that is accommodating rather than alienating.

Rogerian arguments

Refutation

First hand evidence

Classical oration

Tags

CCSS.W.9-10.1A

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

CCSS.SL.9-10.1D

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Also called an assertion or proposition. It states the argument’s main idea or position.

Straw man

Claim

Assumption

Ad hominem

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Logical process whereby the writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion, which is also called a generalization.

Assumption

syllogism

Induction

Warrant

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Also known as the bandwagon appeal, this fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to “everybody’s doing it, so it must be a good thing to do.” - Ad Populum

True

False

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

Warrant- In the Toulmin model, this consists of further assurances or data without which the assumption lacks authority.

True

False

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?