
Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint
Authored by BRYAN NEUMAN
History
9th - 12th Grade
Used 60+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
15 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Judicial philosophy in which justices create and influence law from the bench.
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Judicial philosophy in which justices reaffirm previous legal decisions
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea that the Supreme Court has the ability to determine if the actions ofgovernment or government officials is constitutional
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
The reluctance to interpret the law and to hesitate to overturn existing legal precedent unless it is obviously unconstitutional is called what?
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
Role of the judicial branch
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
holds that judges should actively interpret the Constitution, statutes and precedents in light of established principles when elected representatives fail to act in clear accord with these principles
judicial activism
judicial conference
judicial restraint
judicial review
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
holds that judges should broadly defer to precedent and to decisions made by legislatures
judicial restraint
judicial review
judicial activism
judicial conference
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?