Search Header Logo

Unit 3 Review-US Legal Systems

Authored by Wendy Davidson

History

8th - 12th Grade

Used 12+ times

Unit 3 Review-US Legal Systems
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

26 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Can your rights be limited?

Yes. You cannot yell out fire in a crowded place if there is not a fire.

No, you can yell out fire in a crowded place if there is not a fire.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

If North Carolina decided to have sudents pray and meditate daily in school, that decision would be

Unconstitutional, restricting the right of free expression.

Constitutional, allowing for freedom of religion.

Constitutional, allowing for the riht of free expression.

Unconstitutional, restricting the freedom of religion.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Media Image

In the Supreme Court Case Tinker v Des Moines, which amendment was found to have been violated?

1st

3rd

5th

14th

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What is the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor?

A misdemeanor is a less serious crime, punishable by a year in jail. or less. A felony is a more serious crime, punishable by more than a year in jail.

A misdemeanor is a more serious crime, punishable by more than a year in jail.A felony is a less serious crime, punishable by a year in jail. or less.

There is no difference.

I don't know the difference.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What are the steps of a criminal trial?

Lawyers prepare, arraignment, jury decides, arrest

Arraignment, arrest, Lawyers prepare, Jury decides

Arrest, Arraignment, jury decides, lawyers prepare

Arrest, Arraignment, Lawyers prepare, Judy decides

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the 7th amendment, if you are suing for more than $20 in civil court, what do you have the right to?

A judge.

A jury.

A lawyer.

A bailiff.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

In Mapp v Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that evidence found illegally (violates the 4th amendment) cannot be used in court. (Inadmissible/Prohibited/Not allowed). How were the rights of the accused strengthened?

Due process now had to be followed.

This case held criminals accountable for their crimes.

Evidence obtained illegally could NOW be used in court.

The case held law enforcement accountable for the way they secure evidence.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?