Search Header Logo

Supreme Court Cases 2

Authored by Arthur III

History

7th Grade

Used 135+ times

Supreme Court Cases 2
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

20 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Tinkers were suspended from school for...

holding up signs in the cafeteria.
wearing black armbands.
giving emotional speeches during class.
holding a "sit in" in the principal's office.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

In _____ v. _____ a man was accused of stealing wine and money from a pool hall in Florida.  He couldn't afford an attorney so he represented himself. Because of this; the Supreme Court ruled that people who couldn't afford an attorney would have one appointed by the state.

Furman v. Georgia
Gideon v. Wainwright
Brown v. Board
Tinker v. Des Moines

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional

McCulloch v Maryland
Ohio v Mapp
Marbury v Madison
Maine v Maryland

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Students wore black arm bands protesting Vietnam War, they were suspended
DECISION: A student does not shed his rights at the door.  Black armbands to protest the Vietnam War can be worn since they are not disruptive

Tinker v Des Moines
Marybury v Madison
McCulloch v Maryland
Johnson v Texas

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Established the concept of “separate but equal” in public facilities

Dred Scott v Sanford
Plessy v Ferguson
Marbury v Madison
McCulloch v Maryland

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Schools were desegregated.  Separate is unequal. Separate but equal has no placeIntegrated schoolsOverturned Plessy v. Ferguson

Dred Scott v Sanford
Korematsu v U.S.
Brown v Board of Education
Bethel School District v Fraser

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

All accused persons are entitled to a lawyer, even if they cannot afford one. Right to CounselPerson must have counsel provided, regardless of the charges filed against them

Mapp v Ohio
Gideon v Wainwright
Miranda v Arizon
Roe v Wade

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?