EXERCISE ON UTBK

EXERCISE ON UTBK

University

15 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Skimming and Scanning: PAPERBACK FICTION

Skimming and Scanning: PAPERBACK FICTION

12th Grade - University

10 Qs

NARRATIVE TENSES AND LINKERS

NARRATIVE TENSES AND LINKERS

University

13 Qs

Course 6 Review!

Course 6 Review!

University

14 Qs

Quiz 2 - Level I - English I

Quiz 2 - Level I - English I

University

20 Qs

ASEAN

ASEAN

University

16 Qs

TẬP PHẢN XẠ NHANH WH QUESTION - PART 2|TOEIC NGÔ HUYỀN MY

TẬP PHẢN XẠ NHANH WH QUESTION - PART 2|TOEIC NGÔ HUYỀN MY

University

20 Qs

Verb Tense

Verb Tense

University

10 Qs

Environmental change. Unlock 4 LS U6 p111-112

Environmental change. Unlock 4 LS U6 p111-112

University

16 Qs

EXERCISE ON UTBK

EXERCISE ON UTBK

Assessment

Quiz

English

University

Practice Problem

Medium

Created by

lela nurlela

Used 12+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

15 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

As the cost of gas and oil for home heating has gone up, many Americans have switched from these fuels to wood for heating their homes. In 1973, approximatety 200.000 wood burning stoves, intended for heating their homes use, were sold in the United States; by the end of 1981, there were as many as seven million home-owned wood-burning units in the U.S.

In addition to low fuel bills, many people choose these stoves because their initial cost is very low (the price range from $50 kits to $5,000 top-of-the-line models), and because new technology has made wood fires more efficient, cleaner, and, therefore, safer than ever before.

One new technological feature of this type is the catalytic combustor which adds about $100 to $200 to the cost of the stove, but which causes much more complete combustion of the wood, therefore, burns up more of the pollutants left by incomplete combustion and produces more heat.

A second cost-saving innovation is a device which agitates the wood, increasing the amount of oxygen that reaches the center of the wood pile, and leading to more efficient combustion. The real advantage of this device is that it allows the owner to make use of cheap sources of wood such as dirty wood chips (an industrial by-product) that have almost no commercial value, cost as little $20 a ton, and burn efficiently in furnaces without an agitator.


According to the author, which of the following is not a factor in the recent increase in popularity of wood-burning stoves?

Their greater cleanliness than in the old days

The high cost of alternative heating fuels

The wide range of prices

The relatively cheap cost of their energy source

The invention of cost-saving innovation

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

As the cost of gas and oil for home heating has gone up, many Americans have switched from these fuels to wood for heating their homes. In 1973, approximatety 200.000 wood burning stoves, intended for heating their homes use, were sold in the United States; by the end of 1981, there were as many as seven million home-owned wood-burning units in the U.S.

In addition to low fuel bills, many people choose these stoves because their initial cost is very low (the price range from $50 kits to $5,000 top-of-the-line models), and because new technology has made wood fires more efficient, cleaner, and, therefore, safer than ever before.

One new technological feature of this type is the catalytic combustor which adds about $100 to $200 to the cost of the stove, but which causes much more complete combustion of the wood, therefore, burns up more of the pollutants left by incomplete combustion and produces more heat.

A second cost-saving innovation is a device which agitates the wood, increasing the amount of oxygen that reaches the center of the wood pile, and leading to more efficient combustion. The real advantage of this device is that it allows the owner to make use of cheap sources of wood such as dirty wood chips (an industrial by-product) that have almost no commercial value, cost as little $20 a ton, and burn efficiently in furnaces without an agitator.


Which of the following statements is an example of an innovation in wood-burning stoves?

Dirty wood chips

The catalytic combustor

$5.000 top-of-the-line-models

Industrial by-products

Oxygen agitator

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

As the cost of gas and oil for home heating has gone up, many Americans have switched from these fuels to wood for heating their homes. In 1973, approximatety 200.000 wood burning stoves, intended for heating their homes use, were sold in the United States; by the end of 1981, there were as many as seven million home-owned wood-burning units in the U.S.

In addition to low fuel bills, many people choose these stoves because their initial cost is very low (the price range from $50 kits to $5,000 top-of-the-line models), and because new technology has made wood fires more efficient, cleaner, and, therefore, safer than ever before.

One new technological feature of this type is the catalytic combustor which adds about $100 to $200 to the cost of the stove, but which causes much more complete combustion of the wood, therefore, burns up more of the pollutants left by incomplete combustion and produces more heat.

A second cost-saving innovation is a device which agitates the wood, increasing the amount of oxygen that reaches the center of the wood pile, and leading to more efficient combustion. The real advantage of this device is that it allows the owner to make use of cheap sources of wood such as dirty wood chips (an industrial by-product) that have almost no commercial value, cost as little $20 a ton, and burn efficiently in furnaces without an agitator.


Which of the following statements is NOT true?

Wood-burning stoves are safer and more efficient than they used to be.

No factories exist for the purpose of producing dirty wood chips.

Both catalytic combustor and wood agitators save money in the long run.

Wood-burning stoves with catalytic combustors cost between $100 and $200.

A ton dirty wood chips cost about $20.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

As the cost of gas and oil for home heating has gone up, many Americans have switched from these fuels to wood for heating their homes. In 1973, approximatety 200.000 wood burning stoves, intended for heating their homes use, were sold in the United States; by the end of 1981, there were as many as seven million home-owned wood-burning units in the U.S.

In addition to low fuel bills, many people choose these stoves because their initial cost is very low (the price range from $50 kits to $5,000 top-of-the-line models), and because new technology has made wood fires more efficient, cleaner, and, therefore, safer than ever before.

One new technological feature of this type is the catalytic combustor which adds about $100 to $200 to the cost of the stove, but which causes much more complete combustion of the wood, therefore, burns up more of the pollutants left by incomplete combustion and produces more heat.

A second cost-saving innovation is a device which agitates the wood, increasing the amount of oxygen that reaches the center of the wood pile, and leading to more efficient combustion. The real advantage of this device is that it allows the owner to make use of cheap sources of wood such as dirty wood chips (an industrial by-product) that have almost no commercial value, cost as little $20 a ton, and burn efficiently in furnaces without an agitator.


From the text we may conclude that ...

many Americans have switched from hydrocarbon-based fuels to wood because the price of the latter has risen

catalytic combustor increase the amount of pollution caused by wood-burning stoves

agitators are a cheaper addition to wood-burning stoves than catalytic combustors

the need for stoves exploded more in 1973 than any period time

some wood-burning stoves cost one hundred times more than other

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

The pain of a migraine headache can virtually disable a person who suffers from it. Millions and millions of people suffer from migraines, although many of them do not even recognize that a migraine is different from a regular headache. A migraine is not at all the same as normal headache, and it seems to have a very physical cause.

One symptom of a migraine is a precursor, which is a visual aura before an attack. Yet only about a third of patients actually experience that, and it is therefore not a requirement in the diagnosis. Other symptoms include increased pain when a person moves, nausea, and sensititivity to light and sound.

Scientists now believe that migraines are caused, not by abnormal blood vessels as previously believed, but instead by a unique electrical disorder of brain cells. Physicians used to treat migraines with medicine to constrict blood vessels because of the belief that dilated blood vessels were the cause.

The new research has been enchanced by imaging devices that allow scientists to watch patient brains during an attack. The results show that sufferers have abnormally excitable neurons, or brain nerve cells. Prior to the attack, the neurons suddenly fire off electrical pulses at the back of the brain, which ripple like waves on a lake after a stone hits the water. They ripple across the top and then the back of the brain, ultimately affecting the brain stem where the pain centers are located. The pain then generates possibly from the brain stem itself or from blood vessels inflamed by the rapidly changing blood flow, or perhaps from both.

Scientists have experimented by applying a powerful magnet to stimulate the neurons and discovered that some people’s brains react differently, than others. When stimulation was applied to the brains of people who had suffered migraines, they saw the initial aura, and some actually suffered migraines. When the same stimulation was applied to the brains of people who had never suffered migraines, they realized no effect and the neurons showed no change.

Scientists and doctors continue to work on the research in an attempt to find the perfect treatment. It is considered important to treat migraines because it is believed that prolonged untreated attacks could cause physical changes in the brain leading to chronic pain.


The author indicates that the precursor to a migraine ...

is a fiction

happens to all migraine sufferers

occurs during or after the attack

is something some sufferers see before an attack

ripple like waves on a lake

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

The pain of a migraine headache can virtually disable a person who suffers from it. Millions and millions of people suffer from migraines, although many of them do not even recognize that a migraine is different from a regular headache. A migraine is not at all the same as normal headache, and it seems to have a very physical cause.

One symptom of a migraine is a precursor, which is a visual aura before an attack. Yet only about a third of patients actually experience that, and it is therefore not a requirement in the diagnosis. Other symptoms include increased pain when a person moves, nausea, and sensititivity to light and sound.

Scientists now believe that migraines are caused, not by abnormal blood vessels as previously believed, but instead by a unique electrical disorder of brain cells. Physicians used to treat migraines with medicine to constrict blood vessels because of the belief that dilated blood vessels were the cause.

The new research has been enchanced by imaging devices that allow scientists to watch patient brains during an attack. The results show that sufferers have abnormally excitable neurons, or brain nerve cells. Prior to the attack, the neurons suddenly fire off electrical pulses at the back of the brain, which ripple like waves on a lake after a stone hits the water. They ripple across the top and then the back of the brain, ultimately affecting the brain stem where the pain centers are located. The pain then generates possibly from the brain stem itself or from blood vessels inflamed by the rapidly changing blood flow, or perhaps from both.

Scientists have experimented by applying a powerful magnet to stimulate the neurons and discovered that some people’s brains react differently, than others. When stimulation was applied to the brains of people who had suffered migraines, they saw the initial aura, and some actually suffered migraines. When the same stimulation was applied to the brains of people who had never suffered migraines, they realized no effect and the neurons showed no change.

Scientists and doctors continue to work on the research in an attempt to find the perfect treatment. It is considered important to treat migraines because it is believed that prolonged untreated attacks could cause physical changes in the brain leading to chronic pain.


The prior treatment for migraines included medicine that ...

eliminated any pain

) tightened blood vessels

eliminated the aura

eliminated stress

prolonged attacks

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 1 pt

The pain of a migraine headache can virtually disable a person who suffers from it. Millions and millions of people suffer from migraines, although many of them do not even recognize that a migraine is different from a regular headache. A migraine is not at all the same as normal headache, and it seems to have a very physical cause.

One symptom of a migraine is a precursor, which is a visual aura before an attack. Yet only about a third of patients actually experience that, and it is therefore not a requirement in the diagnosis. Other symptoms include increased pain when a person moves, nausea, and sensititivity to light and sound.

Scientists now believe that migraines are caused, not by abnormal blood vessels as previously believed, but instead by a unique electrical disorder of brain cells. Physicians used to treat migraines with medicine to constrict blood vessels because of the belief that dilated blood vessels were the cause.

The new research has been enchanced by imaging devices that allow scientists to watch patient brains during an attack. The results show that sufferers have abnormally excitable neurons, or brain nerve cells. Prior to the attack, the neurons suddenly fire off electrical pulses at the back of the brain, which ripple like waves on a lake after a stone hits the water. They ripple across the top and then the back of the brain, ultimately affecting the brain stem where the pain centers are located. The pain then generates possibly from the brain stem itself or from blood vessels inflamed by the rapidly changing blood flow, or perhaps from both.

Scientists have experimented by applying a powerful magnet to stimulate the neurons and discovered that some people’s brains react differently, than others. When stimulation was applied to the brains of people who had suffered migraines, they saw the initial aura, and some actually suffered migraines. When the same stimulation was applied to the brains of people who had never suffered migraines, they realized no effect and the neurons showed no change.

Scientists and doctors continue to work on the research in an attempt to find the perfect treatment. It is considered important to treat migraines because it is believed that prolonged untreated attacks could cause physical changes in the brain leading to chronic pain.


The word others in line 17 refers to ...

other people

the brains

the brains of the scientists

other people’s brain

the neurons of the brain

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?