
Should Schools Limit Students Online Speech DOCS
Authored by Taylor O'Dell
Social Studies
7th - 12th Grade
Used 2+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
10 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
According to this graph in Document A, what is the title of this graph?
Cyberbullying by Days
Cyberbullying by Gender
Cyberbullying by Staff
Cyberbullying by Years
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
According to this graph in Document A, who is more likely to be a cyberbully?
Boys
Girls
Teachers
Kayne West
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Based on the graph in Document A, which argument below would SUPPORT school's limiting student online speech?
According to the graph in Document A, cyberbullying by teachers is out of control. A record 84.9% of teachers have been bullied online. This must be stopped!
According to the graph in Document A, cyberbullying by students is out of control. A disturbing 30.5% of boys and 36.7% of girls have been victims of cyberbullying. This must be stopped!
According to the graph in Document A, cyberbullying among students is not a huge problem. Only 7.7% of boys and 4.4% of girls have cyberbullied somebody in the last 30 days. Schools need to provide counseling, not punishments.
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Based on the chart in Document B, which argument below would SUPPORT school's NOT limiting student online speech?
According to a survey of British Teachers (2009) in Document B, only 15.1% of British school teachers were being cyberbullied, and 38.6% of that percentage weren't affected at all. If relatively few teachers are being bullied, why limit all students' speech rights?
According to a survey of British Students (2009) in Document B, 84.9% of students responded that they had not been a victim of cyberbullying. Cyberbullying isn’t really much of a problem based on this data.
According to a survey of British Teachers (2009) in Document B, 25% of teachers became ill or stressed from cyberbullying and continued to work. The effects of cyberbullying are chilling. Something must be done. We must step up as school officials to stop cyberbullying.
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Based on the text in Document C, which argument below would SUPPORT school's NOT limiting student online speech?
According to Document C, although K.K's actions were done off campus and off school hours, they still affected S.N negatively. Cyber bullying such as K.K's hate website should be punished due to the fact that mistreating other students can leave an impact that lasts for a lifetime.
According to Document C, K.K.’s Freedom of Speech was violated when the school punished her for creating a website outside of school on her personal computer. Schools must be stopped from punishing students when they are not at school.
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Based on the text in Document D, which argument below would SUPPORT school's limiting student online speech?
According to Document D, school officials must prove that a substantial disruption has occurred in order to punish a student for material posted online. The court argues in favor of J.S. citing Tinker v. Des Moines, where courts decided that students' freedom of speech does not stop at the schoolhouse door. Schools must protect and respect students’ online speech.
According to Document D, there were “general rumblings” about the profile which caused disruptions in at least two classes. Something must be done about students posting inappropriate and offensive content online, even if they are outside of school.
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Based on the text in Document F, which argument below would SUPPORT school's limiting student online speech?
The authors are saying that bullying has always been around and cyberbullying is another form of it. Students and teachers must be protected from all forms of bullying. We must not listen to the author’s original intent, students’ speech must be kept from harming others.
According to Document F, the problems young people experience online, and specifically cyberbullying, have been exaggerated. Overreacting by restricting students’ speech would not be a good policy; in addition, it would violate the Constitution.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?