Criminal Law Revision

Which of these forms of MR concerns a defendant's foresight of a consequence?

• Intention

• Subjective Recklessness

• Objective Reckless

• Negligence

If a defendant forms the MR of a crime whilst intoxicated then

• He will be able to use the defence of intoxication

• He will satisfy the MR of the crime

• He can only be liable if it is an offence of basic intent

• He can only be liable if it is an offence of specific intent

If a defendant encourages or assists a crime that does not then take place, of which offences could he possibly be liable for? Select any that apply.

• s.44, Serious Crime Act 2007

• s.45, Serious Crime Act 2007

• s.46, Serious Crime Act 2007

• Joint enterprise attempt as a secondary party

In addition to using, or seeking to put another person in fear of being then and there subjected to, force, to be liable for robbery D must do so in order to fulfill which other elements? Select all that apply

• Appropriate

• Property

• Belonging to another

• Intending to permanently deprive the other of it

• Dishonesty

The test from which case should be used to determine dishonesty, if s.2 of the Theft Act does not apply

• Ghosh

• Turner (No.2)

• Ivey

• Oxford v Moss

One of the 3 MR elements for fraud by false representation is an intention to make a gain or cause a loss in money or property. It is further further defined in which section of the 2006 Act

• s.3

• s.4

• s.5

• s.6

Which of the following are key authorities on conditional consent? Select all that apply.

• Linekar

• Bree

• Assange

• F v DPP

The two part test for the defence of duress is derived from which case

• Graham

• Hasan

• Sullivan

• Kingston

If D is in a state of automatism according to the test in Bratty, the next steps are... (select all that apply)

• If it was due to an internal cause, switch to the M'Naghten rules to see if D could rely on the defence of insanity instead

• If it was due to an internal cause, ask was it recklessly self-induced?

• If it was due to an external cause, switch to the M'Naghten rules to see if D could rely on the defence of insanity instead

• If it was due to an external cause, ask was it recklessly self-induced?

Self-defence has a 2 stage test. What are the two stages?

• D believed it was necessary to use force

• A reasonable person would have thought it necessary to use force

• D believed the force used was not grossly disproportionate

• The force used was reasonable