Logical Fallacies #1

Logical Fallacies #1

10th Grade

25 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Ethos, Logos, Pathos

Ethos, Logos, Pathos

KG - University

20 Qs

ENG II Logical Fallacies

ENG II Logical Fallacies

10th Grade

20 Qs

Vocab. List 4 Practice

Vocab. List 4 Practice

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Intro to Debate Hirten 1883

Intro to Debate Hirten 1883

9th - 12th Grade

23 Qs

Rhetorical Devices

Rhetorical Devices

6th - 11th Grade

25 Qs

Persuasive Essays

Persuasive Essays

7th Grade - University

25 Qs

Informative, Persuasive, and Argumentative Writing Techniques

Informative, Persuasive, and Argumentative Writing Techniques

10th Grade

20 Qs

Argument analysis (revision)

Argument analysis (revision)

10th Grade

20 Qs

Logical Fallacies #1

Logical Fallacies #1

Assessment

Quiz

English

10th Grade

Medium

CCSS
RI.8.8, RI. 9-10.8, L.2.1E

+10

Standards-aligned

Created by

Terick (FVHS)

Used 20+ times

FREE Resource

25 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

All millennials are karens.

Hasty Generalization: Conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.

Ad hominem: attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself

Appeal to authority: Insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered.

Post hoc: Claiming that because event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X, without properly establishing what really caused event Y.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Republicans are racists.

Hasty Generalization: Conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.

Ad hominem: attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself

Red Herring: redirecting the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond. The deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the original argument.

False Dichotomy: When only two choices are presented yet more exist, or a spectrum of possible choices exists between two extremes

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

“People nowadays only vote with their emotions instead of their brains.”

Hasty Generalization: Conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.

Red Herring: redirecting the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond. The deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the original argument.

Post hoc: Claiming that because event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X, without properly establishing what really caused event Y.

False Dichotomy: When only two choices are presented yet more exist, or a spectrum of possible choices exists between two extremes

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Parents today would rather their kids suppress their identity rather than just be who they are even if it doesn't go with the norm.

Hasty Generalization: Conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.

Ad hominem: attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself

Red Herring: redirecting the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond. The deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the original argument.

Appeal to authority: Insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

People who read are smart.

Hasty Generalization: Conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.

Ad hominem: attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself

Red Herring: redirecting the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond. The deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the original argument.

Appeal to authority: Insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

person 1 : "We should argue with logic facts"

person 2: "You should grow a brain before you open your mouth"

Hasty Generalization: Conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.

Ad hominem: attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself

Appeal to authority: Insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered.

False Dichotomy: When only two choices are presented yet more exist, or a spectrum of possible choices exists between two extremes

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Person 1:

"I am for raising the minimum wage in our state."


Person 2:

"She is for raising the minimum wage, but she is not smart enough to even run a business."

Hasty Generalization: Conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.

Ad hominem: attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself

Red Herring: redirecting the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond. The deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the original argument.

Post hoc: Claiming that because event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X, without properly establishing what really caused event Y.

Tags

CCSS.L.2.1E

CCSS.L.3.1A

CCSS.L.3.1G

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?