Fallacies

A vague argument

Statements that express your reasons or evidence

Defects in the arguments you are making

A subcategory of fallacies

None of these options

The whole basis of your argument

Defects in the argument you are making

The character/credibility a person creates

rejecting an argument based on its origins rather than on its own merits.

Accepting one's argument without hesitation

Forgetting the origins of an argument, but repeating it anyway.

An argument in which the middle term is undistributed, meaning that not all the instances of things that are C are also instances of things that are A or of B

A subcategory of red herring that involves misrepresenting an opponent’s position to make it easier to attack

Rejecting an argument based on its origins rather than on its own merits

Labeling one thing as the cause of another thing on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence or using evidence that conflicts with established higher-level truths or theories

Undistributed middle

Equivocation

Straw man

False cause

Skips the middle ground: ie., things that are C also have to be A and B.

Only discusses the middle ground: things that are A and B are almost never C.

Person 1: “I think that we should give better study guides to students”

Person 2: “I think that your idea is bad, because we shouldn't just give out easy A's to everyone”.

Person 1: "I disagree with the new budget for our company."

Person 2: "The new budget will help my department!"

Person 1: "I think we need more chairs in room A."

Person 2: "There will only be 45 people in room A."

Person 1: I'd rather have a dog than a cat.

Person2: Why do you hate cats?

Pretend that you are arguing with yourself.

Never speak out an argument, always write it down.

List the evidence for each of your main points/reasons.

Always respond to the person's argument as quickly as possible.

Fairly categorize the arguments of others.