Search Header Logo

9/2 Per 2 Warm-Up

Authored by Christine Smith

Science

6th - 8th Grade

Used 1+ times

9/2 Per 2 Warm-Up
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

4 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

3 mins • 5 pts

An experiment is performed on plants to see how different liquids affect plant growth. Each plant in the experiment is given a different liquid; water, apple juice, or milk. Each plant has the same amount of soil, sunlight, and listens to the same music. In this investigation, the independent variable is ...

The type of plant
The amount of sunlight
The type of music
The type of liquid

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

In 1897, Joseph Thomson discovered that atoms contain electrons. He proposed a change in the atomic theory of that time, and the theory was modified because of his discovery. Since Thomson’s discovery, atomic theory has been further modified. What is the best explanation for why scientific theories are modified?

Theories more than ten years old are usually out of date.

Scientists want to prove that the work of other scientists is wrong.

New evidence that supports a revision prompts scientists to modify earlier theories.

So much information is available today that it is harder to focus research and disprove theories.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 5 pts

Natalie is using a three-dimensional representation to study the parts of the human heart. Isaiah is working in a laboratory to test the hypothesis that plants grow taller in green light than in white light. Which of the following best

compares their activities?

Natalie is conducting a scientific investigation, and Isaiah is not.

Natalie is not conducting a scientific investigation, and Isaiah is.

Natalie is conducting an experiment, and Isaiah is conducting a field study.

Natalie is investigating a scientific model, and Isaiah is conducting

an experiment.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

2 mins • 5 pts

Jacob conducted an investigation to determine the effect of acid on different types of rocks. He found that the data he collected do not support his hypothesis. Why would Jacob's hypothesis still have some value?

It might lead to the development of new investigations.

It demonstrates that Jacob needs more practice investigating.

It might encourage Jacob to investigate the effect of bases instead.

It shows that Jacob's investigation could have been better planned.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?