Summer School Evaluation

The input given by the lecturers was:

• 1. Not at all beneficial

• 2. Slightly beneficial

• 3. Moderatly beneficial

• 4. Mostly beneficial

• 5. Completely beneficial

The work in groups was:

• 1. Not at all beneficial

• 2. Slightly beneficial

• 3. Moderatly beneficial

• 4. Mostly beneficial

• 5. Completely beneficial

The plenary discussions were:

• 1. Not at all beneficial

• 2. Slightly beneficial

• 3. Moderatly beneficial

• 4. Mostly beneficial

• 5. Completely beneficial

The materials, literature and sources provided were:

• 1. Not at all beneficial

• 2. Slightly beneficial

• 3. Moderatly beneficial

• 4. Mostly beneficial

• 5. Completely beneficial

The sessions were prepared and facilitated well with concise and logical structures

• 1. Strongly disagree

• 2. Disagree

• 3. Neutral

• 4. Agree

• 5. Strongly agree

The lecturers had sound knowledge of the subjects taught

• 1. Strongly disagree

• 2. Disagree

• 3. Neutral

• 4. Agree

• 5. Strongly agree

Enough space was given for participation and other student activities

• 1. Strongly disagree

• 2. Disagree

• 3. Neutral

• 4. Agree

• 5. Strongly agree

What was the most significant learning outcome for you?

What was missing?

How would you represent the group environment?