Search Header Logo

Credit Worthiness 2

Authored by Elio Kfoury

Education

1st - 3rd Grade

Used 1+ times

Credit Worthiness 2
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does fvtpl stand for?

Financial value terminated by period-based liabilities.

Fair value through profit or loss.

Fair value treatment of profitable loans.

Financial volatility through profit and loss.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What percentage of risk weighted assets are banks required to hold in capital under Basel 3?

4%

6%

8%

10%

none of the above

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of these instruments are subject to the IFRS 9 impairment requirements? 

Large trade receivables book for corporate customers. Typically, the credit terms allow for 60 days, and customers will be required to undergo a thorough credit screening and sign a contractual agreement. Trade receivables are measured at amortized cost. 

Contracts with customers under IFRS 15.  

Investments in bonds at amortized cost 

All the above 

 

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

A colleague of yours says that although IFRS 9 assessments are relevant, you can just assess significant credit risk when contractual payments are more than 30 days due. You reply: 

I must disagree. The 30-day rebuttable presumption is used only to assess whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset is credit-impaired. 

I respectfully disagree – the rebuttable presumption is not an absolute indicator that lifetime expected credit losses should be recognized. One is still required to use forward-looking information to assess significant increases in credit risk in a portfolio basis. It cannot just rely on past-due information. 

That’s correct! When an instrument is 30 days past due, it will always be an indicator that there has been a significant increase in credit risk. However, there are many ways in determining whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk. The standard’s principles are relevant but if you want to use the 30-day rebuttable presumption method, it is absolutely acceptable. 

That is not 100% correct. You can only follow that approach if you align the timing of significant increases in credit risk and the recognition of lifetime expected losses to when a financial asset is regarded as credit impaired. In other words, if you want to use the 30-day rebuttable presumption, you need to make sure that the instrument is considered credit-impaired at the point of being outstanding for 30 days. 

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Which of the following correctly describes what a 12-month expected loss represents? 

The expected credit losses on a particular financial asset to be incurred over the next 12 months. 

The present value of expected credit losses that result from all possible default events over the expected life of a financial instrument.

The amounts expected to be written off over the next 12 months multiplied by a 12-month probability of default.

A portion of the lifetime expected credit losses that represent the expected credit losses that result from default events on a financial instrument that are possible within the 12 months after reporting date. 

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?