Search Header Logo

Case Law

Authored by Jennifer Brewer

Other

9th - 12th Grade

Used 51+ times

Case Law
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

26 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Allows the officer to pat down a suspect for officer safety

Tennessee v. Garner

Terry v. Ohio

Mapp v. Ohio

Miranda v. Arizona

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

An arresting officer may search the arrestee's person to discover and remove weapons and to seize evidence to prevent its concealment or destruction, and may search the area "within the immediate control" of the person arrested, meaning the area from which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence

Chimel v California

Connor v Graham

Mapp v Ohio

Carroll v United States

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect only if the officer has a good-faith belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others

Mapp v Ohio

Carroll v US

Terry v Ohio

Tennessee v Garner

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous

Abel v. US

Terry v. Ohio

Arizona v. Gant

Miranda v Arizona

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Under the Fifth Amendment, any statements that a defendant in custody makes during an interrogation are admissible as evidence at a criminal trial only if law enforcement told the defendant of the right to remain silent and the right to speak with an attorney before the interrogation started, and the rights were either exercised or waived in a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent manner

Miranda V Arizona

Graham v. Connor

Mapp v. Ohio

Brown v. Board of Education

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The seizure is legal if the officer, in stopping and searching the vehicle, has reasonable or probable cause for believing that contraband liquor is being illegally transported in it

Abel v. US

Gideon v Wainwright

Carroll v. US

Brown v Board of Education

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal

Garner v Tennessee

Brown v. Board of Education

Mapp v. Ohio

Arizona v. Gant

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?