Fact Pattern: An internal auditor has submitted a first draft of an engagement communication to an engagement client in preparation for an exit meeting. An excerpt is below.
The engagement was performed to accomplish several objectives:
- Verify the existence of unused machinery being stored in the warehouse.
- Determine whether machinery had been damaged during storage.
- Review the handling procedures being performed by personnel at the warehouse.
- Determine whether proper accounting procedures are being followed for machinery kept in the warehouse.
- Calculate the current fair value of warehouse inventories.
- Compare the total value of the machinery with accounting records.
It was confirmed that, of the 30 machines selected from purchasing records for the sample, 13 were present on the warehouse floor and another 5 were on the loading dock ready for conveyance to the production facility. 12 others had already been sent to the production facility at a previous time. An examination of the accounting procedures used at the warehouse revealed the failure by the warehouse accounting clerk to reconcile inventory records monthly, as required by policy. A sample of 25 machines was examined for possible damage, and all but 1 was in good condition. It was confirmed by the internal auditors that handling procedures outlined in the warehouse policy manual appear to be adequate, and warehouse personnel apparently were following those procedures, except for the examination of items being received for inventory.
At a minimum, the following elements should be included in final engagement communications: purpose, scope, and results. Results include observations, conclusions (opinions), recommendations, and action plans. Which of the following describes all of the elements missing from the engagement communication?