Annotation Formative Review

What score would the following student annotation receive?

(C) - I think this is Colonialism because it gives context of how "Blood" got its title.

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

Low

1) Your annotations show a lack of engagement or understanding of the text

2) Your annotation label is missing and unclear

3) Your analysis is inaccurate or not relevant

4) Your annotation is unclear and missing key details for it to be insightful

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.10

CCSS.RI.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10

CCSS.RI.8.10

What score would the following student annotation receive?

(PC) I see post colonialism because the Natives, who were once colonized have found a way to unite and reclaim their presence in the modern world.

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

High

1) Your annotations demonstrate critical engagement with the text, meaning you have full sentences and make accurate connections. 

2) Your annotations display an implicit understanding of the text by analyzing it for meaning. You clearly identify conflicts and clearly know the difference between colonial and post-colonial

Tags

CCSS.RF.3.3B

CCSS.RF.3.3C

CCSS.RF.3.3D

CCSS.RF.4.3A

CCSS.RF.5.3A

What score would the following student annotation receive?

CO: This is an example of colonialism because it shows how colonizers took so much from Natives that they are still dealing with today, they took land, lives, resources and more. It may seem like history to some but to others it means more because it still happens today.

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

High

1) Your annotations demonstrate critical engagement with the text, meaning you have full sentences and make accurate connections. 

2) Your annotations display an implicit understanding of the text by analyzing it for meaning. You clearly identify conflicts and clearly know the difference between colonial and post-colonial

Tags

CCSS.RF.1.3A

CCSS.RF.1.3D

CCSS.RI.1.3

CCSS.RI.2.3

CCSS.RI.3.8

What score would the following student annotation receive?

(CF) I see person vs person because Calvin is struggling with his native identity because he feels like it's wrong to claim being native if you dont know anything about it.

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

Medium

1) Your annotations demonstrate an understanding of the text, but it stays at the surface level

2) Even though you share an insight, you may be missing a label or mislabeled an annotation, or your insight is lacking focus

3) You show a surface-level analysis but there is room to go deeper, or you don’t show a clear understanding of the difference between colonialism and postcolonialism

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.8

CCSS.RL.6.3

CCSS.RL.7.3

CCSS.RL.8.3

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

What score would the following student annotation receive?

cf- person vs history because he is talking about the history of natives and his family

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

Low

1) Your annotations show a lack of engagement or understanding of the text

2) Your annotation label is missing and unclear

3) Your analysis is inaccurate or not relevant. For example, your conflict annotation doesn’t identify conflict.

4) Your annotation is unclear and missing key details for it to be insightful

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.8

CCSS.RL.6.3

CCSS.RL.7.3

CCSS.RL.8.3

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

What score would the following student annotation receive?

R- My reaction of the Blood is how they compared it to a river system how fast the bloods flows.

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

Low

1) Your annotations show a lack of engagement or understanding of the text

2) Your annotation label is missing and unclear

3) Your analysis is inaccurate or not relevant. For example, your conflict annotation doesn’t identify conflict.

4) Your annotation is unclear and missing key details for it to be insightful

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.10

CCSS.RI.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10

CCSS.RI.8.10

What score would the following student annotation receive?

CF: I see person vs. history because Dene is trying to tell Native stories that history has failed to tell. He is trying to show the truth rather than the lies told in history books.

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

High

1) Your annotations demonstrate critical engagement with the text, meaning you have full sentences and make accurate connections. 

2) Your annotations display an implicit understanding of the text by analyzing it for meaning. You clearly and accurately identify conflicts and clearly know the difference between colonial and post-colonial

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.8

CCSS.RL.6.3

CCSS.RL.7.3

CCSS.RL.8.3

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

What score would the following student annotation receive?

I: I think he thinks that he doesn't know anything about it. He doesn't feel native.

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

Low

1) Your annotations show a lack of engagement or understanding of the text

2) Your annotation label is missing and unclear

3) Your analysis is inaccurate or not relevant. For example, your conflict annotation doesn’t identify conflict.

4) Your annotation is unclear and missing key details for it to be insightful

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.10

CCSS.RI.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10

CCSS.RL.8.10

What score would the following student annotation receive?

CO- I see colonialism in that he is referring to when the US government had a loophole to not pay the natives because of the amount to native blood they have .

• High (3)

• Medium (2)

• Low (1)

Answer explanation

Medium

1) Your annotations demonstrate an understanding of the text, but it stays at the surface level

2) Even though you share an insight, you may be missing a label or mislabeled an annotation, or your insight is lacking focus

3) You show a surface-level analysis but there is room to go deeper, or you don’t show a clear understanding of the difference between colonialism and postcolonialism

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.10

CCSS.RI.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10

CCSS.RL.8.10