Independent Practice Tinker V. DesMoines

What caused the conflict between the students and the school?

• The school permitted the students to protest local events only.

• The school prohibited the students to wear dark colored clothes.

• The students refused to wear the armbands after the school permitted it.

• The students chose to wear the armbands after the school banned all protests.

Tags

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What caused the conflict between the students and the school?

• The school permitted the students to protest local events only.

• The school prohibited the students to wear dark colored clothes.

• The students refused to wear the armbands after the school permitted it.

• The students chose to wear the armbands after the school banned all protests.

Tags

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Why did the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa rule in favor of the school? (Paragraphs 8-9)

• The First Amendment covers only actual speech, not "symbolic" speech.

• The school's right to create order outweighed the students' rights.

• The students had no protection under the First Amendment

• The armbands were not a form of symbolic speech.

Why did the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa rule in favor of the school? (Paragraphs 8-9)

• The First Amendment covers only actual speech, not "symbolic" speech.

• The school's right to create order outweighed the students' rights.

• The students had no protection under the First Amendment

• The armbands were not a form of symbolic speech.

Why did the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa rule in favor of the school? (Paragraphs 8-9)

• The First Amendment covers only actual speech, not "symbolic" speech.

• The school's right to create order outweighed the students' rights.

• The students had no protection under the First Amendment

• The armbands were not a form of symbolic speech.

Why did the author include this detail in the article? [RI.5] The students’ lawyer, Dan Johnston, argued that the school district had allowed other forms of political speech in the school, including political buttons. No riots or upheavals resulted. (Paragraph 10)

• To support the school preventing all forms of political speech\

• To demonstrate that other types of political speech did not lead to disruption

• To prove that the school had a history of major disruptions due to political speech

• To disagree with the school about allowing all forms of political speech on school grounds

Why did the author include this detail in the article? [RI.5] The students’ lawyer, Dan Johnston, argued that the school district had allowed other forms of political speech in the school, including political buttons. No riots or upheavals resulted. (Paragraph 10)

• To support the school preventing all forms of political speech\

• To demonstrate that other types of political speech did not lead to disruption

• To prove that the school had a history of major disruptions due to political speech

• To disagree with the school about allowing all forms of political speech on school grounds

Tags

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.2

CCSS.RL.11-12.2

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

Which detail from the text best demonstrates the Supreme Court’s decision about students’ rights?

• “Justice Fortas wrote that students and teachers do not ‘shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.’” (Paragraph 11)

• “Uncontrolled and uncontrollable liberty is an enemy to domestic peace ” (Paragraph 19)

• “some students in Iowa schools – and, indeed, in all schools – will be ready, able, and willing to defy their teachers on practically all orders.” (Paragraph 19)

• “In this case, the school failed to present any real evidence that wearing black armbands would disrupt education at the school.” (Paragraph 20)

Tags

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1