CFAB: Consideration_Intention to Create Legal Relation

CFAB: Consideration_Intention to Create Legal Relation

University

20 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Contracts and Obligations

Contracts and Obligations

University

20 Qs

Q1 Civics Vocab (pt3)

Q1 Civics Vocab (pt3)

6th Grade - University

16 Qs

Revolutions

Revolutions

10th Grade - University

15 Qs

APWH Unit 5

APWH Unit 5

10th Grade - University

15 Qs

Legal Considerations - Chapter 8 - contracts

Legal Considerations - Chapter 8 - contracts

9th Grade - University

25 Qs

Contracts

Contracts

11th Grade - University

15 Qs

Offer

Offer

University

15 Qs

Law of Contract

Law of Contract

University

20 Qs

CFAB: Consideration_Intention to Create Legal Relation

CFAB: Consideration_Intention to Create Legal Relation

Assessment

Quiz

Social Studies

University

Medium

Created by

Siti Samawati

Used 7+ times

FREE Resource

20 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

22 Mr and Mrs Higgins own two flats in Bristol which they let to students. When their eldest son, Crispin, was offered a place at Bristol University to read Law, he and his parents entered into a tenancy agreement allowing him to reside at one of the flats during his university studies for a rent of £190 per month. He was allowed to sublet the second bedroom for a rent of £200 per month. In the light of the rebuttable presumption that no intention to create legal relations exists in the case of a family, social or domestic arrangement, which of the following statements best describes the legal position as to whether the necessary intention to create legal relations exists in this instance?
A No, because it is a family or domestic arrangement and so no such intention is presumed
B No, because the fact that Crispin pays a reduced rent is evidence that no such intention exists
C Yes, the normal presumption in family arrangements is rebutted by the fact that the parties enter into a written agreement and rent is payable
D Yes, because the normal presumption does not apply where the arrangement relates to property

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

23 Are the following statements true or false?There is a rebuttable presumption that social, domestic and family arrangements are not intended to be legally binding.
A True
B False

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

23 There is an irrebuttable presumption that parties to a commercial agreement intend it to be legally binding.
C True
D False

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

24 Which of the following statements best describes consideration?
A Consideration must be adequate and sufficient
B Consideration must be adequate but need not be sufficient
C Consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate
D Consideration need be neither sufficient nor adequate

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

25 Can the following constitute valid consideration?The payment of £1 per year as rent for a house
A Yes
B No

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

25 Can the following constitute valid consideration? A promise by Adam not to pursue his action for breach of contract against Ben, if Ben agrees to do Adam's accounts for him for 12 months without charge
C Yes
D No

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

26 Zoe was employed to give one lunchtime recital per month at a prestigious eating venue in London. Her contract contained a provision that she would stay behind and meet with appreciative members of the audience after the recital, as part of the venue's aim of making music more accessible and less elitist. After about 18 months, Zoe's recitals had become very popular but she was always keen to get away quickly after each performance. The manager offered her £50 (on top of her recital fee) if she would stay behind and meet with appreciative members of the audience for up to an hour after each recital. Can Zoe enforce the promise to pay her the extra £50?
A Yes. It is a fresh promise that the manager chose to make
B Yes, because the contractual provision had become redundant through its non-observance
C No, because she was obliged to perform that duty anyway
D No. It was simply a goodwill gesture and is not intended to be legally binding

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?