Fallacy

for the philosophers of this tradition, language objectively describe truth

according to him, language is SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTED

whose work on philosophical logic and the philosophy of language

the science of how to evaluate arguments and reasoning

process of evaluation which uses logic to separate truth from falsehood, reasonable from unreasonable beliefs

a defect in an argument other than its having false premises

a specific kind of appeal to emotion in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting his or her opponent's feeling of pity

whatever has not been proved false must be true, and vice versa

aka calling two different things by the same, in an ambiguous way, to mean two or more things

infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. the reverse of this fallacy is division