AP Language of Composition Chapter 3: Analyzing Arguments

What is argumentative writing?

• Argumentative writing is a type of writing that aims to entertain rather than persuade.

• Argumentative writing is a type of writing that focuses on personal opinions rather than evidence.

• Argumentative writing is a type of writing that presents a claim or argument and supports it with evidence and reasoning.

• Argumentative writing is a type of writing that presents multiple conflicting viewpoints without taking a stance.

What are some key elements to consider when analyzing persuasive texts?

• Title and cover design, author's biography, book reviews

• Plot and characters, setting and theme, conflict and resolution

• Grammar and punctuation, font size and style, paper quality

• Rhetorical appeals, target audience, author credibility, evidence and examples, tone and language, structure and organization

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

How can you write an effective thesis statement?

• Do not provide a roadmap

• State your main argument or claim, provide a roadmap, and be specific and focused.

• Be vague and general

• Include multiple main arguments or claims

What are logical fallacies and why are they important to identify?

• Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning or flawed arguments that are important to identify because they can lead to false conclusions and prevent rational and logical thinking.

• Identifying logical fallacies is a waste of time and has no impact on critical thinking.

• Logical fallacies are only used by people who lack intelligence.

• Logical fallacies are valid and reliable arguments that should be embraced.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What are some common logical fallacies?

• red herring

• circular reasoning

• bandwagon fallacy

• ad hominem, straw man, false cause, appeal to authority, slippery slope

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

How can argumentative writing be improved?

• By using emotional language and personal attacks

• By ignoring counterarguments and opposing viewpoints

• By using complex and convoluted language

• By conducting thorough research, organizing thoughts logically, providing strong evidence and counterarguments, using clear and concise language, and addressing opposing viewpoints respectfully.

What strategies can be used to analyze persuasive texts effectively?

• Identify purpose, evaluate credibility, analyze persuasive techniques, consider audience and context, look for counterarguments, evaluate evidence, assess effectiveness

• Identify purpose, evaluate credibility, analyze persuasive techniques, consider audience and context, look for emotional appeals, evaluate evidence, assess effectiveness

• Identify purpose, evaluate credibility, analyze persuasive techniques, consider audience and context, look for supporting arguments, evaluate evidence, assess effectiveness

• Identify tone, evaluate credibility, analyze persuasive techniques, consider audience and context, look for counterarguments, evaluate evidence, assess effectiveness

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

What are the characteristics of a strong thesis statement?

• Long, vague, uncontroversial, and provides a vague focus for the essay.

• Detailed, general, arguable, and provides a clear focus for the essay.

• Concise, specific, arguable, and provides a clear focus for the essay.

• Concise, specific, uncontroversial, and provides a vague focus for the essay.

Why is it important to avoid logical fallacies in writing?

• Logical fallacies can strengthen the credibility of an argument and lead to sound reasoning.

• Logical fallacies have no impact on the credibility of an argument.

• Logical fallacies are only relevant in spoken communication, not in writing.

• Logical fallacies can weaken the credibility of an argument and lead to faulty reasoning.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

How can logical fallacies be avoided in argumentative writing?

• By using emotional appeals and personal anecdotes in the argument

• By relying solely on personal opinions and beliefs

• By carefully examining and evaluating the premises and reasoning used in the argument, avoiding common fallacies, using clear and logical reasoning, providing evidence and examples, and considering counterarguments.

• By ignoring counterarguments and opposing viewpoints