
LM 213 Activity 2 Tanada vs. Tuvera (2)
Authored by Marvin Cabantac
Social Studies
University
Used 1+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
15 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
According to the text, what right do the petitioners invoke?
Right to privacy
Right to free speech
Right to be informed
Right to bear arms
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What is the purpose of the petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus?
To compel the government to publish laws
To request a change in the Constitution
To challenge the constitutionality of certain laws
To advocate for stricter government regulations
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which of the following presidential decrees is NOT specifically mentioned in the text?
Presidential Decree No. 179
Presidential Decree No. 286
Presidential Decree No. 427
Presidential Decree No. 734
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What argument do the respondents make for dismissing the case?
The petitioners have no legal standing
The laws in question are not important
The laws have already been published
The issue is not of public concern
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What does the Supreme Court ruling state about the effectivity of laws without publication?
They have no binding force and effect
They are automatically repealed
They remain valid until publication occurs
They are subject to interpretation by the courts
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
According to the majority opinion, what is the purpose of publication in the Official Gazette?
To ensure the laws are followed by the public
To provide official notice to the affected parties
To generate revenue for the government
To increase transparency in the legislative process
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which of the following statements is true based on the first case of Tanada vs. Tuvera ?
All presidential decrees mentioned in the text have been published
The publication of laws in the Official Gazette is required by the Constitution
The respondents argue that publication in the Official Gazette is unnecessary
The Court's ruling applies only to future presidential decrees
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?