Wk 4 Part 2 ALS461_Basic Logical Concepts Hypothetical Syllogism

Wk 4 Part 2 ALS461_Basic Logical Concepts Hypothetical Syllogism

University

10 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Argumentos deductivos.

Argumentos deductivos.

University

8 Qs

JurK SW 10 - Recap

JurK SW 10 - Recap

University

8 Qs

GGSR: Chapter 2

GGSR: Chapter 2

University

15 Qs

Procesos cognitivos 2 Tercera Unidad

Procesos cognitivos 2 Tercera Unidad

University

10 Qs

Fallacies

Fallacies

10th Grade - University

9 Qs

Razonamiento deductivo

Razonamiento deductivo

10th Grade - Professional Development

6 Qs

AJ -15OCT2020

AJ -15OCT2020

University

10 Qs

Parcial. Teorías y métodos.

Parcial. Teorías y métodos.

University

5 Qs

Wk 4 Part 2 ALS461_Basic Logical Concepts Hypothetical Syllogism

Wk 4 Part 2 ALS461_Basic Logical Concepts Hypothetical Syllogism

Assessment

Quiz

Other

University

Hard

Created by

FATIN BAHRN

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

If we’re in London, then we’re in England. We are not in

England. So, we are not in London.

modus ponens

modus tollens

chain argument

denying the antecedent

affirming the consequent

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

If we’re in Los Angeles, then we are in the United States. We

are in the United States. So, we are in Los Angeles.

modus ponens

modus tollens

chain argument

denying the antecedent

affirming the consequent

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

3. If we’re in the United States, then we are on Earth. We are in

the United States. So, we are on Earth.

modus ponens

modus tollens

chain argument

denying the antecedent

affirming the consequent

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

If we’re in Paris, then we are in France. If we’re in France, then

we are in Europe. So, if we are in Paris, then we are in Europe.

modus ponens

modus tollens

chain argument

denying the antecedent

affirming the consequent

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

5. If we’re in Houston, then we are in the United States. We are not

in Houston. So, we are not in the United States.

modus ponens

modus tollens

chain argument

denying the antecedent

affirming the consequent

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

If we’re in Shanghai, then we are in China. So, we are in China,

because we are in Shanghai.

modus ponens

modus tollens

chain argument

denying the antecedent

affirming the consequent

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

We are not in Mexico, because if we are in Mexico City, we are

in Mexico, and we are not in Mexico City.

modus ponens

modus tollens

chain argument

denying the antecedent

affirming the consequent

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?