10/25 Daily Warmup

U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the 6th Amendment to mean that suspects have the right to a lawyer while being interrogated

• Moran v. Burbine

• Miranda v. Arizona

• Edwards v. Arizona

• Escobedo v. Illinois

once a suspect asks for a lawyer, questioning must cease

• Nix v. Williams

• Miranda v. Arizona

• Edwards v. Arizona

• Escobedo v. Illinois

suspects must be notified of their rights after custody and before questioning

• Nix v. Williams

• Miranda v. Arizona

• Edwards v. Arizona

• Escobedo v. Illinois

waiver of Miranda rights must be "knowing and intelligent"

• Miranda v. Arizona

• Illinois v. Perkins

• Nix v. Williams

• Moran v. Burbine

exception to the exclusionary rule - if a suspect is not informed up Miranda rights and, under questioning, suspect's statements lead to evidence, the evidence can still be used in court if the discovery was inevitable

• Arizona v. Mauro

• Illinois v. Perkins

• Nix v. Williams

• Moran v. Burbine

prosecutors cannot mention the fact that a defendant invoked his/her right to silence

• Doyle v. Ohio

• Arizona v. Mauro

• Illinois v. Perkins

• Moran v. Burbine

being quiet does not constitute invoking the right to remain silent

• Berghuis v. Thompkins

• Doyle v. Ohio

• Arizona v. Mauro

• Miranda v. Arizona