10/25 Daily Warmup
Authored by Tara Briggs
Other
9th - 12th Grade
Used 1+ times
AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
7 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the 6th Amendment to mean that suspects have the right to a lawyer while being interrogated
Moran v. Burbine
Miranda v. Arizona
Edwards v. Arizona
Escobedo v. Illinois
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
once a suspect asks for a lawyer, questioning must cease
Nix v. Williams
Miranda v. Arizona
Edwards v. Arizona
Escobedo v. Illinois
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
suspects must be notified of their rights after custody and before questioning
Nix v. Williams
Miranda v. Arizona
Edwards v. Arizona
Escobedo v. Illinois
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
waiver of Miranda rights must be "knowing and intelligent"
Miranda v. Arizona
Illinois v. Perkins
Nix v. Williams
Moran v. Burbine
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
exception to the exclusionary rule - if a suspect is not informed up Miranda rights and, under questioning, suspect's statements lead to evidence, the evidence can still be used in court if the discovery was inevitable
Arizona v. Mauro
Illinois v. Perkins
Nix v. Williams
Moran v. Burbine
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
prosecutors cannot mention the fact that a defendant invoked his/her right to silence
Doyle v. Ohio
Arizona v. Mauro
Illinois v. Perkins
Moran v. Burbine
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
being quiet does not constitute invoking the right to remain silent
Berghuis v. Thompkins
Doyle v. Ohio
Arizona v. Mauro
Miranda v. Arizona
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
Continue with Google
Continue with Email
Continue with Classlink
Continue with Clever
or continue with
Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?
