CPS_AmerGov_3FAF_CS6_23-24

CPS_AmerGov_3FAF_CS6_23-24

12th Grade

7 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Federalists VS. Anti-Federalists

Federalists VS. Anti-Federalists

12th Grade

8 Qs

Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Federalists and Anti-Federalists

12th Grade

10 Qs

01.22 Federalists & Anti-Federalists

01.22 Federalists & Anti-Federalists

9th - 12th Grade

12 Qs

Fed vs Antifed

Fed vs Antifed

8th - 12th Grade

12 Qs

Federalist or Anti-Federalists: Who said it?

Federalist or Anti-Federalists: Who said it?

8th - 12th Grade

9 Qs

Basic Principles of the Constitution

Basic Principles of the Constitution

11th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

US Constitution Fundamentals

US Constitution Fundamentals

11th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Unit 5 After Rev Test Review

Unit 5 After Rev Test Review

9th - 12th Grade

12 Qs

CPS_AmerGov_3FAF_CS6_23-24

CPS_AmerGov_3FAF_CS6_23-24

Assessment

Quiz

History

12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Jamia Lewis

Used 9+ times

FREE Resource

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which concept was at the center of the Anti-Federalist position as expressed in the 'Anti-Federalist Papers'?

Standing army

Limited government

Checks and balances

Strong central government

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

Why did the Federalists want to include the Necessary and Proper Clause in the Constitution?

To give citizens more opportunities to select government officials

To allow the national government the power to effectively run the country

To provide a guarantee of sovereignty to individual states

To protect the individual liberties of all citizens

Answer explanation

Media Image

The Necessary and Proper Clause is also known as the Elastic Clause. Anti-Federalists argued this would allow the Federal government to abuse their power.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The following statements reflect positions taken by which group of people?

1. The supremacy clause places too

much power in the national government.

  1. 2. The inclusion of the bill of rights is

    necessary to protect against government

    intrusion.

  2. 3. The powers of the national government

    should be clearly defined and limited relative

    to the powers of the state governments.

 

Anti-Federalists

Federalists

4.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Prior to the ratification of the US Constitution, Federalists and Anti-Federalists argued over the basic principles and limits in the role of the government. The quotations shown reflect those arguments. Use your knowledge of Federalists v. Anti-Federalists to identify which group held each of the positions shown.

In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and then the portion allowed to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments. Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.

Anti-Federalist

Federalist

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

Based on their arguments during the ratification debate, which statement describes what the Anti-Federalists would have thought about the Force Bill?

Anti-Federalists would have sided with Congress and President Jackson because they opposed trading with other countries.

Anti-Federalists would have sided with South Carolina because they opposed having an overly powerful federal government.

Anti-Federalists would have sided with Congress and President Jackson because they supported increased power for state governments.

Anti-Federalists would have sided with South Carolina because they supported the principle of absolute power.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

What was an Anti-Federalist concern about the US Constitution that was addressed by this amendment?

The Constitution would produce state courts that were more powerful than federal courts.

The Constitution failed to adequately protect the civil liberties of individuals.

The Constitution would reduce the power of the federal government.

The Constitution failed to give sufficient powers to the executive branch.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which viewpoint does this excerpt demonstrate? If the new Constitution be examined with accuracy and candor [honesty], it will be found that the change which it proposes consists much less in the addition of NEW POWERS to the Union, than the invigoration of its ORIGINAL POWERS. . . . The powers relating to war and peace, armies and fleets, treaties and finance, with the other more considerable powers, are all vested in the existing Congress by the articles of Confederation. The proposed change does not enlarge these powers/ it only substitutes a more effectual mode of administering them.

The Federalist viewpoint that federal law should be supreme to state law when they conflict

The Anti-Federalist viewpoint that a powerful national government poses a threat to the civil liberties of individual citizens

The Anti-Federalist viewpoint that the Constitution should grant state governments the power to overturn laws at the national level

The Federalist viewpoint that the Constitution will address the weaknesses of the prior system of government