Search Header Logo

Unit 5 Landmark Cases QUIZ

Authored by Dawn Kohl

others

Used 4+ times

Unit 5 Landmark Cases QUIZ
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

15 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 6 pts

1.Tinker v. Des Moines and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier both had rulings based on which amendment?

1st amendment
6th amendment
14th amendment
19th amendment

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 7 pts

2. Which was an outcome of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954)?

Administrators may limit the content of students’ publications.
The federal government ordered that states desegregate schools.
Students have a reduced expectation of privacy in school.
Criminal defendants have the right to an attorney.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 7 pts

3. Which Supreme Court case resulted in the “separate but equal” doctrine?

A. Plessy v Ferguson
B. Brown v. The Board of Education
C. Tinker v. Des Moines School District
D. In re’ Gault

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 7 pts

4. What lessons did future U.S. leaders learn from the 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Nixon?

A. The president is accountable for obeying the law.
B. The president is responsible for enforcing the law.
C. The president is not allowed to hold secret talks with foreign governments.
D. The president is not allowed to have private meetings with Cabinet members.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 6 pts

5. Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v The Board of Education both had rulings based on which amendment?

A. 1st amendment
B. 6th amendment
C. 14th amendment
D. 19th amendment

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 7 pts

6. In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, what were the students protesting?

A. Standardized tests
B. The Vietnam War
C. The Election Results
D. Segregation

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 7 pts

7. Following the 1966 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, police began informing people placed under arrest that they "have the right to remain silent." What basic freedom is this meant to protect, and how does it affect arrested individuals?

A. The right to freedom of speech; it provides them with the ability to speak to their attorneys without fear of incrimination.
B. The protection against self-incrimination; it informs them that speaking to law enforcement could incriminate them.
C. The protection of due process; it prevents convicted offenders from receiving cruel and unusual punishments.
D. The right to freedom of assembly; it prevents law enforcement from asking them questions without the presence of an attorney

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?