Philosophy Quiz

Philosophy Quiz

11th Grade

10 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Intro to Philosophy

Intro to Philosophy

9th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Philosophy- Module 1 (Quiz 1)

Philosophy- Module 1 (Quiz 1)

11th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

Intro to Philo

Intro to Philo

11th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Philo sophia

Philo sophia

11th Grade

10 Qs

NTROPHP

NTROPHP

11th Grade

10 Qs

philosophy

philosophy

KG - Professional Development

15 Qs

PHILOSOPHY

PHILOSOPHY

11th Grade

11 Qs

Introduction to Philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy

11th Grade

10 Qs

Philosophy Quiz

Philosophy Quiz

Assessment

Quiz

Philosophy

11th Grade

Hard

Created by

Tim Becker

FREE Resource

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the difference between deontological and consequentialist ethical theories?

Deontological theories focus on the past of actions, while consequentialist theories focus on the future of actions.

Deontological theories focus on the location of actions, while consequentialist theories focus on the weather during actions.

Deontological theories focus on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions, while consequentialist theories focus on the outcomes or consequences of actions.

Deontological theories focus on the color of actions, while consequentialist theories focus on the size of actions.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Explain the concept of virtue ethics and provide an example of how it can be applied in real-life situations.

One example of applying virtue ethics in real-life situations is when a person chooses to act with honesty and integrity in their interactions with others, even when it may not be the most advantageous choice for them personally.

Applying virtue ethics means always following the rules and laws, regardless of the situation.

Virtue ethics is when a person acts based on their own self-interest without considering the impact on others.

In real-life situations, virtue ethics is about doing whatever it takes to achieve success, even if it means being dishonest or unethical.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Discuss the ethical implications of the trolley problem and provide your perspective on the best course of action.

There is no universally agreed upon best course of action, as it depends on individual ethical beliefs and perspectives.

The best course of action is to always pull the lever and sacrifice the one person to save the five.

The best course of action is to do nothing and let the trolley continue on its current path.

The ethical implications of the trolley problem are irrelevant and should not be considered.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the concept of substance in metaphysics and how does it relate to the idea of change?

Substance is the color of a thing, and change is the size of that thing.

Substance is the smell of a thing, and change is the taste of that thing.

Substance is the underlying essence of a thing, and change is the transformation of that thing over time.

Substance is the surface appearance of a thing, and change is the complete destruction of that thing.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Explain the difference between dualism and monism in metaphysical theories.

Dualism is the belief that the mind and body are the same

The mind and body are either separate entities (dualism) or ultimately the same thing (monism).

Dualism and monism are the same thing

The mind and body are both physical entities

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Discuss the concept of time in metaphysics and how it relates to the idea of causality.

Time in metaphysics is irrelevant and has no connection to causality.

Metaphysics does not concern itself with the concept of time and causality.

The concept of time in metaphysics is purely subjective and varies from person to person.

Time in metaphysics is often seen as a fundamental aspect of reality and is closely related to the concept of causality.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning in logic?

Deductive reasoning starts with a general principle and applies it to a specific case, while inductive reasoning starts with specific observations and uses them to form a general principle.

Deductive and inductive reasoning are the same thing.

Deductive reasoning starts with specific observations and uses them to form a general principle.

Inductive reasoning starts with a general principle and applies it to a specific case.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?