Revolutions Unit 5 AP World History Quiz

“After long periods of error, philosophers have at last discovered the true rights of man and how they can all be deduced from the single truth: that man is a perceptive being capable of reason and acquiring moral ideas.

At last, man could proclaim his rights out loud, rights that for so long had been ignored. He could submit all opinions to his own reason and use that reason to search for truth. Every man learned with pride that nature had not forever condemned him to base his beliefs on the opinions of others or the superstitions of antiquity.

Thus developed an understanding that the natural rights of man are inalienable and cannot be forfeited and a strongly expressed desire for freedom of thought, trade, and profession. There also developed a desire to alleviate people's suffering, to eliminate all criminal laws against political dissenters, and to abolish torture. A desire arose for a milder system of criminal legislation that could give complete security to the innocent. All of these principles gradually filtered down from philosophical works to every class of society whose education went beyond basic literacy. These principles became the common faith of all people.”

Marquis de Condorcet, French nobleman and philosopher, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind, published in 1794

Which of the following is an implicit claim that the author makes in the third paragraph?

• The failure to grant political rights to women is at odds with the idea of natural rigths.

• The French Revolution has advanced the principles of the Enlightenment.

• The economic policies of the French monarch have been the main cause of the revolution.

• The calls to reform the criminal justice system do not take into account the severity of the social problems posed by France's high crime rates.

Answer explanation

Correct. Condorcet wrote during the early stages of the French Revolution. While he does not explicitly describe the French Revolution in the third paragraph, it is the clear context for this passage. In the third paragraph, he claims that the various Enlightenment principles and policies that he mentions have filtered down through every level of society and have become the common faith of all people.

Source 1

“Beloved brothers in Christ, here again we should see and admire the boundless love of God toward us, that He has placed over us this great empire of the Ottomans. The Empire is a mighty obstacle to the Latin heretics in the West. By contrast, to us, the Orthodox people of the East, the Empire has been a means of salvation. For God has continued to put into the heart of the Sultan of these Ottomans an inclination to keep free the religious beliefs of our Orthodox faith and to protect us, even to the point of occasionally chastising Christians who deviate from their faith.

Brothers, lately you would have heard a lot about this new system of ‘liberty’ originating in France. But let us examine the concept more carefully to see if it can be reconciled with good civil government and safety for the citizens. We see from the example of the French Republic that a national, democratic form of government can only provide ‘liberty’ if the word is taken to mean the freedom to simply act upon one’s appetites and desires. But true Christian liberty, properly understood, means something quite different: to be free to live according to both divine and human laws. In other words, it is to live free to follow your conscience and free of any trouble with the authorities. Seen in this light, the new French system of liberty is a path leading to destruction, confusion, overturning of good government, or, simply speaking, a new ambush of the devil to lead us Orthodox Christians astray.”

Anthimos, Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem [then part of the Ottoman Empire], Paternal Instruction, leaflet printed in Greek for distribution among Christian communities in the Ottoman Empire, 1798

Source 2

“I address you in Hungarian today* because reviving our language is like cleansing the mirror of our history, so that the flies buzzing around may not deprive us of its light. It is a sad fate for a nation to perish—especially a nation such as ours that can boast of brilliant feats and that has only sunk to its present condition through the bitter workings of fate.

It is of no use to try to accept with stern philosophy, common sense, and cold blood that all men are equal in everything, that the whole human race is a single nation. No! We are national beings and we were raised with our Hungarian selves that way, so that we can never be Germans, or French, or Poles, or Spaniards. We long for glory in this life as Hungarian sons of the Hungarian nation and, in the next, we pray that the angels of the heavens may know us as Hungarians.

It is time for the mind of the Hungarian nation to be clarified through a revival of our mother-tongue. How can our educated classes study the languages of Europe, if we are forgetting our own? How could we lift up our people, most of whom live in the countryside, if we cannot offer them books to read in the language they speak? What we urgently need is a group of scholars who would be paid solely to translate works from Latin, French, German, and Greek into Hungarian—this would do more good for the refinement of the country’s mind than a thousand Latin and German schools.”

*At the time, many educated Hungarians preferred to communicate in German, the language of the Austrian Empire of which Hungary was a part.

György Bessenyei, Hungarian writer, “Oration on the Subject Matter of the Nation,” essay published in 1817

Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the arguments made in the two sources regarding ideas of liberty and equality?

• Both sources reject the ideas for the same reason, namely that demands for liberty and equality would lead to political instability and sweeping social changes in Europe.

• Source 1 rejects the ideas because of the threat they represent to multinational empires, whereas Source 2 rejects the ideas because of the universal and equalizing nature of their claims.

• Source 1 embraces the ideas because of the promise of emancipation they hold to oppressed minority groups, whereas Source 2 embraces the ideas because of their origins in Enlightenment thought.

• Both sources embrace the ideas for the same reason, namely that liberty and equality are inalienable natural rights and governments’ attempts to restrict those rights are doomed to fail.

Answer explanation

Correct. Source 1 sees the protections offered by multinational empires toward minority groups to be of crucial importance and the French Revolution to be a threat toward those protections, whereas Source 2 rejects the idea that all people are equal because it claims that national differences are inherent and fundamental among people.

RAILROAD LINES (IN KILOMETERS) IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES, 1830 TO 1850

Source: Data adapted from Robert Strayer, Ways of the World, 2nd ed. (Boston: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2013), 836.

*The data for Germany include all German states with the exception of Austria.

Based on the chart, which of the following best describes a pattern in the spread of railroads in Europe from 1830 to 1850 ?

• Multinational empires adopted railroads more extensively than other states did.

• Countries that industrialized the latest had the most extensive mileage of railroads by 1850.

• The largest countries had the most extensive railroad networks by 1850.

• Areas in northwestern Europe adopted railroads more extensively than areas in other parts of Europe.

Answer explanation

Correct. The table shows that the northwestern European countries of Great Britain, France, and the German states adopted railroads more extensively than did Russia, Italy, or Austria-Hungary.

“THE TRIUMPH OF STEAM AND ELECTRICITY,” COLOR LITHOGRAPH PRODUCED IN GREAT BRITAIN TO CELEBRATE THE DIAMOND JUBILEE (60 YEARS ON THE THRONE) OF QUEEN VICTORIA, 1897

London Metropolitan Archives, City of London / Bridgeman Images

The six scenes in the center are surrounded by portraits of famous British inventors and scientists.

Question

In the period circa 1750–1900, the historical process illustrated by the image led directly to all of the following major global transformations EXCEPT

• the outbreak of the Atlantic revolutions and the emergence of new states in the Americas

• the transition from human- and animal-powered economies to fossil fuel-powered economies

• a significant increase in transregional trade and migration

• the increasing use of electricity in industrial and consumer applications

Answer explanation

Correct. Although the Industrial Revolution began in Great Britain in the mid-eighteenth century, it was not a factor that led to the Atlantic revolutions and the emergence of new states in the Americas. Since this option does not illustrate a direct connection between the process illustrated in the image and a major global transformation in the period 1750–1900, it is the correct answer.

Unlike the four scenes in the top two rows of the lithograph, the inclusion of the two scenes in the bottom row is best explained by

• state-sponsored industrialization policies motivated by social welfare programs

• the technological innovations of the second industrial revolution

• resistance to industrialization by organized labor motivated by socialist philosophy

• the mathematical and physical discoveries of the Scientific Revolution

Answer explanation

Correct. The top two rows show the transition to steamships and railways from sailing vessels and animal-powered transportation as part of the First Industrial Revolution, while the bottom row shows electric lighting in major cities, which was a product of the second industrial revolution. The First Industrial Revolution, which lasted from the mid-eighteenth century to the mid-nineteenth century, was characterized by new forms of transportation like steam power and railways. The spread of electricity, telecommunications, improvements made to steel manufacturing, and the invention of interchangeable parts all characterized the second industrial revolution of circa 1870–1914.

“In late nineteenth-century Tsarist Russia, the state participated directly in the nation’s economy to an extent unequaled in any Western country. For example, in 1899 the state bought almost two-thirds of all metallurgical production in Russia. By 1900, the state controlled some 70 percent of the railways and owned vast tracts of land, numerous mines and oil fields, and extensive forests. The economic well-being of Russian private entrepreneurs thus depended in large measure on decisions made by the state authorities in St. Petersburg. This was a major reason why a large portion of the Russian middle class took a very timid approach to politics in this period.

Russia’s economic progress, particularly in the last decade of the nineteenth century, was remarkable by every standard. Railway trackage virtually doubled, coal output in southern Russia jumped from just under 3 million tons in 1890 to almost 11 million tons in 1900. In the same region, the production of iron and steel rose from about 140,000 tons in 1890 to almost 1,250,000 in 1900. Also, between 1890 and 1900 Russian production of cotton thread almost doubled and that of cotton cloth increased by about two-thirds. By 1914 the Russian Empire was the fifth-largest industrial power in the world, though its labor productivity and per-capita income still lagged behind those in Western Europe.”

Abraham Ascher, historian, The Revolution of 1905: A Short History, book published in 2004

Question

As described in the passage, the pattern of economic development in Russia in the nineteenth century differed most strongly from which other pattern of economic development during the same period?

• The emergence of resource export economies, such as those in colonial South Asia

• The expansion of transnational businesses, such as global banking and insurance companies

• The implementation of economic policies to promote industrialization, such as the attempts to develop a cotton textile industry in Egypt

• The transition from preindustrial to industrial production through the actions of private entrepreneurs or companies

Answer explanation

The pattern of transitioning from a preindustrial to an industrial economy through private entrepreneurs and investment, as was the typical pattern in the West, was most different from the pattern of industrialization in Russia, which was largely dictated, managed, and financed by the state.

“In late nineteenth-century Tsarist Russia, the state participated directly in the nation’s economy to an extent unequaled in any Western country. For example, in 1899 the state bought almost two-thirds of all metallurgical production in Russia. By 1900, the state controlled some 70 percent of the railways and owned vast tracts of land, numerous mines and oil fields, and extensive forests. The economic well-being of Russian private entrepreneurs thus depended in large measure on decisions made by the state authorities in St. Petersburg. This was a major reason why a large portion of the Russian middle class took a very timid approach to politics in this period.

Russia’s economic progress, particularly in the last decade of the nineteenth century, was remarkable by every standard. Railway trackage virtually doubled, coal output in southern Russia jumped from just under 3 million tons in 1890 to almost 11 million tons in 1900. In the same region, the production of iron and steel rose from about 140,000 tons in 1890 to almost 1,250,000 in 1900. Also, between 1890 and 1900 Russian production of cotton thread almost doubled and that of cotton cloth increased by about two-thirds. By 1914 the Russian Empire was the fifth-largest industrial power in the world, though its labor productivity and per-capita income still lagged behind those in Western Europe.”

Abraham Ascher, historian, The Revolution of 1905: A Short History, book published in 2004

Question

The rapid growth of industrial output in Russia during the 1890s was most likely comparable to the growth of industrial output in which other state during the same period?

• The Ottoman Empire

• Qing China

• Meiji Japan

• Brazil

Answer explanation

Correct. Meiji Japan industrialized its economy by studying and modeling Western economies and through close cooperation between the Meiji government and private conglomerate companies called zaibatsus. These efforts allowed Japan to become an industrial power by the end of the nineteenth century.

“We can agree that, in principle, it might be a good idea to permit both foreigners and Japanese to engage in coastal and seaborne shipping around and from Japan, because that would increase competition and improve efficiency. But, in practice, we know that seaborne shipping is too important a matter to be given over to foreigners. To do so would mean a loss of business and employment opportunities for our people in peacetime. And, in times of war, to not have the domestic capacity to transport goods would be tantamount to abandoning our status as an independent nation.

In recent decades, Japan was forced to sign various treaties with foreign powers allowing their ships to proceed freely from one Japanese harbor to another. Some people claim that these treaty rights also allow foreigners to transport Japanese made goods, either around our country or for export to Korea or China. I am not qualified to discuss the legal merits of these positions, but I would like to point out that, unless we have a plan for developing our own domestic shipping businesses, we will never be able to compete with the foreigners in this field.

In founding the Mitsubishi company,* my goal has been to help recover for Japan the right of seaborne shipping, so we no longer have to delegate it to foreigners. I regard this not only as my business interest but also as my duty as a citizen. If we don’t succeed as a company, it would be useless for the government to try to renegotiate the unequal treaties, or to attempt to further develop Japan’s economy. The government knows this, and that is why it protects our company. And we need the government’s protection to compete against foreign rivals, such as the [British] Peninsula and Oriental Steam Navigation Company. Recently, the P&O Company has been working to set up a new line between Yokohama [in Japan] and Shanghai and is attempting to claim rights over the [Japanese] ports of Nagasaki, Kobe, and Yokohama. The P&O Company is backed by its massive capital, large fleet of ships, and experience operating in Hong Kong and China. How can we compete against such a giant if we do not have the backing of our national government?”

*The Mitsubishi company was established in 1870 as a maritime shipping firm. In subsequent decades, it diversified into mining, manufacturing, and other fields.

Yataro Iwasaki, president of the Mitsubishi Company, letter to company managers, 1876

Question

The commercial rivalries discussed in the third paragraph best illustrate the interplay between nineteenth-century economic development in Japan and the development of

• extractive economies as part of Western imperialism

• Western-dominated large-scale transnational businesses

• a global consumer economy leading to increased living standards worldwide

• new regional and international identities opposed to nationalism

Answer explanation

Correct. The British Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company that Iwasaki refers to in his letter was a transnational business that operated across the world and was seeking to acquire greater dominance in East Asia. These companies began emerging in the nineteenth century, primarily with the aim of acquiring natural resources from Asia, Africa, and Latin America for industrial factories in Western states.

“Writing now, at an age beyond sixty, I must admit that we do not understand the operations of God’s wisdom and are, therefore, unable to tell the causes of the terrible inequalities that we see around us,—why so many people should have so little to make life enjoyable, while a few others, not through their own merit, have had gifts poured out to them from a full hand. We acknowledge the hand of God and His wisdom, but still we feel horror at the misery of many of our brethren. We who have been born in a more fortunate condition—we to whom wealth, education, and liberty have been given—cannot, I think, look upon the unintellectual and toil-bound life of those who cannot even feed themselves sufficiently by the meager wages they have earned with so much sweat, without experiencing some feeling of injustice, some sting of pain.

This consciousness of wrong has produced in many enthusiastic but unbalanced minds a desire to make all things right by pursuing equality. But any careful observer of our society, or any student of our history has to admit that, as unjust as it may seem, inequality is part of the natural order of things. You can make all men equal today, but God has so created them that they shall become unequal again tomorrow. The very word ‘equality’ presents to the imaginations of men ideas of communism, of ruin, and insane democracy. Instead of obsessing about equality, we should be working toward reducing inequalities—provided, of course, that we do so gradually and without any sudden disruption of society.”

Anthony Trollope, British novelist, autobiography written during the 1870s and published after his death in 1882

Question

Which of the following pieces of information that Trollope reveals about himself in the passage might best explain his contention that economic inequalities ought to be addressed “gradually and without any sudden disruption of society”?

• His advanced age

• His Christian faith

• His admission that he was born into a fortunate condition

• His relatively high level of education

Answer explanation

Correct. In the passage, Trollope states that those like him who have been “born in a more fortunate condition” should be “working toward reducing inequalities” in a gradual way that does not erode societal stability and order. It is reasonable to assume that Trollope feared that a sudden or revolutionary change might undermine his own privileged position in society.

“There is no town in the world where the distance between the rich and the poor is so great, or the barrier between them so difficult to be crossed. The separation between the different classes, and the consequent ignorance of each other’s habits and condition, are far more complete in this place than in any other country in Europe, or even in the rural areas of Britain. There is far less personal communication between the master cotton spinner and his workmen and between the master tailor and his apprentices than there is between the Duke of Wellington and the humblest laborer of his estate, or than there was between King George III and the lowliest errand boy in his palace. I mean this not as a matter of blame, but I state it simply as a fact.”

Richard Parkinson, English clergyman of the Anglican Church, “On the Present Condition of the Laboring Poor in Manchester,” paper published in London, 1841

Question

The disparities of wealth mentioned by Parkinson in the passage are best explained in the context of the

• lower prices for consumer goods made possible by industrialization

• higher wages available for industrial work as compared to agricultural work

• high profits and low wages associated with manufacturing industries in the nineteenth century

• failure of urban governments to create infrastructure and public health services in rapidly growing cities

Answer explanation

Correct. The high profits acquired by the rich and low wages paid to the industrial workers led to the disparities of wealth between the social classes.