Elements of Argument

What is a claim in an argument?

• A claim in an argument is a question that the arguer poses to the opponent.

• A claim in an argument is a random fact that may or may not be related to the topic.

• A claim in an argument is a statement that the arguer believes or asserts to be true.

• A claim in an argument is a personal attack on the opponent.

What is evidence and why is it important in an argument?

• Evidence is subjective information that weakens a claim or argument. It is important in an argument because it confuses the audience and makes the argument less convincing.

• Evidence is irrelevant information that has no impact on a claim or argument. It is important in an argument because it adds unnecessary complexity and confusion.

• Evidence is anecdotal stories or personal opinions that have no bearing on a claim or argument. It is important in an argument because it adds emotional appeal and bias.

• Evidence is factual information or data that supports a claim or argument. It is important in an argument because it provides credibility and support for the points being made, helping to persuade the audience of the validity of the argument.

Explain the role of reasoning in constructing an argument.

• Reasoning is essential in constructing an argument as it provides the logical framework and evidence to support the claims being made.

• Constructing an argument does not require any logical framework, it is based on personal beliefs

• Reasoning is not important in constructing an argument, emotions are more effective

• Evidence is not necessary in constructing an argument, opinions are sufficient

What is a counterargument and how does it strengthen an argument?

• A counterargument is a weak argument that undermines the main argument

• A counterargument is an opposing argument that strengthens an argument by addressing potential objections or opposing viewpoints.

• A counterargument is a repetition of the main argument that adds no value

• A counterargument is a distraction that confuses the main argument

Define validity in the context of an argument.

• Validity means the argument is emotionally compelling.

• Validity refers to the popularity of the argument.

• The conclusion logically follows from the premises.

• Validity is determined by the length of the argument.

How does a strong claim contribute to the overall strength of an argument?

• A strong claim contributes to the overall strength of an argument by being vague and unsupported

• A strong claim contributes to the overall strength of an argument by providing a clear and specific assertion that can be supported with evidence and reasoning.

• A strong claim contributes to the overall strength of an argument by being contradictory

• A strong claim contributes to the overall strength of an argument by being emotionally charged

Provide an example of evidence that can be used to support a claim.

• Anecdotal evidence

• Personal opinion

• Unsubstantiated claims

• Statistics

Why is it important to address counterarguments in an argument?

• Counterarguments are not important in an argument

• Addressing counterarguments can confuse the audience

• Ignoring counterarguments shows confidence in the argument

• It is important to address counterarguments in an argument to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the topic and to strengthen the overall argument.

Explain the difference between a strong argument and a valid argument.

• A strong argument is based on opinions, while a valid argument is based on personal beliefs.

• A strong argument is well-supported by evidence and reasoning, while a valid argument follows the rules of logic and reasoning.

• A strong argument is subjective, while a valid argument is objective.

• A strong argument is emotional, while a valid argument is based on facts and evidence.

How can faulty reasoning weaken an argument?

• Faulty reasoning can make an argument more persuasive

• Faulty reasoning can strengthen an argument by adding diversity of thought

• Faulty reasoning can have no impact on an argument

• Faulty reasoning can weaken an argument by undermining its logical coherence and validity.