Search Header Logo

Misrepresentation and economic duress

Authored by S T

Other

Professional Development

Used 14+ times

Misrepresentation and economic duress
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

14 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Silence is not normally misrepresentation. Name the case where the court decided that a governess who stayed silent about her divorce did not misrepresent.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which one of the following cases shows that you can misrepresent by failing to disclose a change of circumstances? (The case of the doctor selling his practice.)

With v O’Flanagan

Dimmock v Hallett

Tate v Williamson

Bisset v Wilkinson

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which one of the following cases shows that you can misrepresent by telling a half-truth? (The case of the sale of land where the tenants were leaving.)

With v O’Flanagan

Dimmock v Hallett

Tate v Williamson

Bisset v Wilkinson

4.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Name the case that shows that actions can be a misrepresentation.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Misrepresentation must concern a statement of material fact and not a statement of opinion. In which of the following was there a statement of material fact?

Bisset v Wilkinson

Smith v Land and House Property Corporation

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Karl offers to sell Sarah his 'Rolex' watch. Sarah isn't sure that it is genuine so she asks Antoni who is a watch expert. Antoni says that it is genuine so she buys it. It turns out that the watch is fake. Can Sarah use misrepresentation against Karl?

Yes

No

Answer explanation

It has to be Karl's misrepresentation that causes Sarah to buy the watch. Here it looks like Antoni is the cause of her purchase. Following Attwood v Small Sarah cannot claim misrepresentation against Karl.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which ONE of the following is the best definition of fraudulent misrepresentation?

The defendant knows that the statement is untrue.

The defendant believed in the truth of the misrepresentation but had no reasonable grounds for their belief.

The defendant either believed the statement to be untrue or was reckless about whether or not it was true.

The defendant made a false statement but believed it to be true on reasonable grounds.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?