Search Header Logo

AP Gov. Unit 3 Review

Authored by Matthew Peitz

History

12th Grade

Used 2+ times

AP Gov. Unit 3 Review
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

40 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), the Supreme Court upheld a student's right to wear an armband in protest. The wearing of the armband was protected as a form of which of the following?

Prior restraint

Symbolic speech

Redress of grievances

Peaceful public protest

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following correctly describes the concept of prior restraint?

The government attempting to prevent something from being published by the press

The right of individuals to plan, coordinate, and execute peaceful methods of protest

The punishment of individuals for making statements critical of the government

The Supreme Court blocking government action on the grounds that it is unconstitutional

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

When the process of incorporation is referred to as "selective," it is in reference to the fact that

the Court only incorporates a right in some cases but not all.

incorporation has happened on an amendment-by-amendment basis.

extension of rights may be withheld from some groups, such as students.

decisions from those cases do not set precedent for future cases.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

McDonald v. Chicago (2010) is the most recent case to use selective incorporation. What right did it incorporate?

The right to privacy

The right to bear arms

The right to an attorney

The right o avoid self-incrimination

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

This case was based on the Establishment Clause

McDonald v. Chicago

Engel v. Vitale

Tinker v. Des Moines

Wisconsin v. Yoder

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

This case was based on the Free Exercise Clause

McDonald v. Chicago

Engel v. Vitale

Tinker v. Des Moines

Wisconsin v. Yoder

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Schenck v. United States established that "Clear and Present Danger" could limit which basic right?

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Press

Freedom of Religion

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?