
AP Gov. Unit 3 Review
Authored by Matthew Peitz
History
12th Grade
Used 2+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
40 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
In Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), the Supreme Court upheld a student's right to wear an armband in protest. The wearing of the armband was protected as a form of which of the following?
Prior restraint
Symbolic speech
Redress of grievances
Peaceful public protest
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which of the following correctly describes the concept of prior restraint?
The government attempting to prevent something from being published by the press
The right of individuals to plan, coordinate, and execute peaceful methods of protest
The punishment of individuals for making statements critical of the government
The Supreme Court blocking government action on the grounds that it is unconstitutional
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
When the process of incorporation is referred to as "selective," it is in reference to the fact that
the Court only incorporates a right in some cases but not all.
incorporation has happened on an amendment-by-amendment basis.
extension of rights may be withheld from some groups, such as students.
decisions from those cases do not set precedent for future cases.
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
McDonald v. Chicago (2010) is the most recent case to use selective incorporation. What right did it incorporate?
The right to privacy
The right to bear arms
The right to an attorney
The right o avoid self-incrimination
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
This case was based on the Establishment Clause
McDonald v. Chicago
Engel v. Vitale
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
This case was based on the Free Exercise Clause
McDonald v. Chicago
Engel v. Vitale
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Schenck v. United States established that "Clear and Present Danger" could limit which basic right?
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Press
Freedom of Religion
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?