Quiz on Persuasive Arguments

What does "Ethos" appeal to in persuasive arguments?

• Logic/Reasoning

• Emotional Appeal

• Character/Credibility

• Humor

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

What is "Pathos" associated with in persuasive rhetoric?

• Ethical Appeal

• Emotional Appeal

• Logical Appeal

• Statistical Evidence

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

What is "Logos" primarily concerned with?

• Emotional Connection

• Ethical Standards

• Logic/Reasoning

• Personal Character

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

What type of reasoning takes a specific case or situation and then draws generalizations or conclusions from them?

• Deductive reasoning

• Emotional reasoning

• Ethical reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Which type of reasoning begins with a generalization and then applies it to a specific case?

• Inductive reasoning

• Emotional reasoning

• Deductive reasoning

• Metaphorical reasoning

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

In deductive reasoning, what comes immediately after the claim statement made by the author?

• Explanation

• Evidence

• Conclusion

• Hypothesis

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is the correct sequence for inductive reasoning?

• Claim/Point → Evidence → Explanation

• Explanation → Claim/Point → Evidence

• Evidence → Explanation → Claim/Point

• Explanation → Evidence → Claim/Point

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Which of the following is NOT one of the three critical elements of both inductive and deductive reasoning?

• A) A strong claim/argument statement

• B) Quality evidence from a credible source

• C) Emotional appeal to the audience

• D) Logical reasoning to defend the claim

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is required to defend a claim in both inductive and deductive reasoning?

• A) Anecdotal evidence

• B) Logical reasoning

• C) A counterargument

• D) A hypothesis

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is the conclusion of the inductive reasoning example provided?

• All bicycles have flat tires.

• Only my bicycle has a flat tire.

• Silver bicycles are the best.

• Flat tires are common on all vehicles.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1