CRWT

is largely objective

- Learning is limited and the reader may not be able to get any useful insight from the author because of reluctance and doubt arising from questions on the author’s credibility

Works on emotional level rather than on intellectual level

-allows the reader to gain insight enough to choose a position about an issue but without having the full capability to justify the choice.

-prevents the reader from a true rhetorical engagement with the text

-is largely subjective

establishes dialogue by allowing all sides to reconsider existing positions and opinions

takes into account "gray areas" of complex arguments.

- Establishes rhetorical engagement between the reader and the text

raise credibility, which makes the arguments more convincing and logical.

• Evidences in Critical Writing

• Evidences in Critical Reading

• Evidences in Descriptive Writing

• Evidences in Descriptive reading