Open source software licensing involves code distribution that must remain under the same ________ terms after modifications.

A project manager realizes that a contracted developer has reused code from a previous project that had a different client. What is the ethical action to take?

• Ignore it to save time and money.

• Report the issue to higher management.

• Ask the developer to replace the code with a new implementation.

• Use the situation to renegotiate the contract for a lower cost.

• Review licensing and permission around the reused code.

Answer explanation

The ethical actions to take include reporting the issue to higher management, asking the developer to replace the code with a new implementation, and reviewing licensing and permission around the reused code.

A developer is under pressure to meet a deadline but discovers that their code might not be fully accessible to users with disabilities. What should they do?

• Release the code as is and address accessibility in a future update.

• Discuss the issue with the team and seek resources to address accessibility immediately.

• Document the shortcomings and set a plan for immediate rectification.

• Claim that the software meets all accessibility standards.

• Prioritize other features over accessibility.

Answer explanation

The developer should discuss the issue with the team and seek resources to address accessibility immediately. They should also document the shortcomings and set a plan for immediate rectification to ensure inclusivity.

A team member overhears a conversation about a colleague using company resources for personal projects. What should they do?

• Confront the colleague directly and demand they stop.

• Report the activity to their supervisor.

• Ignore the situation as it is not their business.

• Join the colleague in using company resources for personal gain.

• Discuss the company policies on resource usage with the colleague.

Answer explanation

Reporting the activity to their supervisor is the correct choice to address misuse of company resources. Discussing company policies with the colleague can also help clarify expectations.

A software tester finds that a new feature passes all technical tests but realizes it may violate user privacy guidelines. What actions are appropriate?

• Release the feature as the technical tests are passed.

• Report the concern to the legal or compliance team.

• Document the issue and suggest a review by an ethics committee.

• Ignore the ethical concerns as it is not part of the job description.

• Modify the feature to comply with privacy guidelines.

Answer explanation

The appropriate actions are to report the concern to the legal or compliance team, document the issue for an ethics committee review, and modify the feature to comply with privacy guidelines.

During a code review, a developer notices that a new algorithm implemented by a teammate can potentially introduce security risks. What should the developer do?

• Approve the code to maintain team harmony.

• Request a security audit for the new algorithm.

• Inform the teammate about the potential risks.

• Remove the algorithm without informing the teammate.

• Suggest a team meeting to discuss the implications of the algorithm.

Answer explanation

The developer should request a security audit for the new algorithm, inform the teammate about potential risks, and suggest a team meeting to discuss the implications, ensuring proper handling of security concerns.

A client asks a developer to add a feature that collects user data without notifying the user. How should the developer respond?

• Add the feature as the client requested.

• Refuse to add the feature and explain the legal implications.

• Suggest an alternative that complies with data protection laws.

• Report the client's request to a supervisor or ethics board.

• Add the feature but make it optional for users.

Answer explanation

The developer should refuse to add the feature and explain the legal implications, suggest an alternative that complies with data protection laws, and report the client's request to a supervisor or ethics board.

An IT manager is tasked with choosing a vendor for a new office software suite. The manager's spouse works for one of the bidding companies. What is the ethical course of action?

• Award the contract to the spouse's company to support them.

• Disclose the personal connection to the decision-making team.

• Abstain from the decision-making process.

• Secretly give the spouse's company confidential bidding information.

• Ensure the spouse's company offers the lowest bid.

Answer explanation

The ethical course of action is to disclose the personal connection to the decision-making team and abstain from the decision-making process.

A programmer discovers another programmer in the office is deliberately writing obfuscated code to secure their position. What should be done?

• Ignore the behavior, considering it a job security strategy.

• Encourage other team members to write clearer code.

• Report the behavior to the project manager.

• Confront the programmer and ask them to stop.

• Organize a workshop on best coding practices for the team.

Answer explanation

Reporting the behavior to the project manager, confronting the programmer, and organizing a workshop on best coding practices are all proactive steps to address the issue of deliberately writing obfuscated code in the office.

A software company's new product might infringe on the patents of a competitor. What should the company do?

• Continue selling the product until a lawsuit is filed.

• Perform a thorough review of the product for any patent infringements.

• Consult a legal expert to understand the implications.

• Seek permission from the competitor to use the patented technology.

• Halt production and redesign the product to avoid patent infringement.

Answer explanation

Performing a thorough review of the product for any patent infringements, consulting a legal expert to understand the implications, and halting production to redesign the product are the correct steps to take when facing potential patent infringement issues.