ALS461_Exercise 3.2 (Hypothetical Syllogism)
Authored by FATIN BAHRN
Social Studies
University
Used 1+ times
AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
10 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
3 mins • 1 pt
If we’re in London, then we’re in England. We are not in England. So, we are not in London.
If we’re in London, then we’re in England. We are not in England. So, we are not in London.
modus ponens
modus tollens
chain argument
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
3 mins • 1 pt
If we’re in Los Angeles, then we are in the United States. We are in the United States. So, we are in Los Angeles.
If we’re in Los Angeles, then we are in the United States. We are in the United States. So, we are in Los Angeles.
modus ponens
modus tollens
chain argument
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
3 mins • 1 pt
We’re in Berlin, given that if we are in Berlin, then we are in Germany, and we are in Germany.
We’re in Berlin, given that if we are in Berlin, then we are in Germany, and we are in Germany.
modus ponens
modus tollens
chain argument
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
3 mins • 1 pt
If we’re in the United States, then we are on Earth. We are in the United States. So, we are on Earth.
If we’re in the United States, then we are on Earth. We are in the United States. So, we are on Earth.
modus ponens
modus tollens
chain argument
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
3 mins • 1 pt
If we’re in Paris, then we are in France. If we’re in France, then we are in Europe. So, if we are in Paris, then we are in Europe.
If we’re in Paris, then we are in France. If we’re in France, then we are in Europe. So, if we are in Paris, then we are in Europe.
modus ponens
modus tollens
chain argument
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
3 mins • 1 pt
If we’re in Houston, then we are in the United States. We are not in Houston. So, we are not in the United States.
If we’re in Houston, then we are in the United States. We are not in Houston. So, we are not in the United States.
modus ponens
modus tollens
chain argument
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
3 mins • 1 pt
If we’re in Shanghai, then we are in China. So, we are in China, because we are in Shanghai.
If we’re in Shanghai, then we are in China. So, we are in China, because we are in Shanghai.
modus ponens
modus tollens
chain argument
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
Continue with Google
Continue with Email
Continue with Classlink
Continue with Clever
or continue with
Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?
