Search Header Logo

Understanding Ontological Arguments

Authored by James Melligan

Philosophy

8th Grade

Used 1+ times

Understanding Ontological Arguments
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Hey Tabby, Mattie, and Mary! Ready for a brain teaser? What type of reasoning do ontological arguments famously use?

a priori

a posteriori

empirical

inductive

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Pop quiz time! Imo, Tabby, and Mattie are discussing in a philosophy seminar. They explore a classic question: According to Anselm, why must God exist?

It is greater to exist in reality than only in the mind

Existence is a perfection

God is a supremely perfect being

God can be conceived as non-existent

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Imo, Mattie, and Clemmie are discussing in their philosophy class. They're examining Descartes' ontological argument. What conclusion do they reach?

God exists because He is the greatest conceivable being

God exists because He is necessary

God exists because we can imagine Him

God exists because existence is a perfection

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Hey Tabby, Imo, and Clemmie! Dive into this brain teaser: What is the main critique by Gaunilo regarding Anselm's argument?

God's existence is not necessary

Existence is not a predicate

God's concept is self-contradictory

Anything can be defined into existence

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

During a lively debate in philosophy class, Clemmie raises a question about Hume's critique. She asks, 'What does Hume argue about the ontological argument?'

'God does not exist' can be coherently conceived

God's existence is necessary

'God does not exist' is a contradiction

Existence adds to the concept of a being

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Hey there, philosophy buffs! Imo, Clemmie, and Mattie are debating a classic topic. They're puzzled about Kant's critique of the ontological argument. Can you help them figure out why Kant thought this argument doesn't hold up?

Existence is not a predicate

Existence is a perfection

God's existence is self-contradictory

God's existence is analytically true

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Hey there, Tabby and Mattie! Let's dive into a deep philosophical question. What is the basis of Malcolm's ontological argument?

God's existence is contingent

God's existence is either necessary or impossible

God's existence is self-evident

God's existence is a perfection

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?