LC3 Topic 2 and 3

Who is the bible written for?

• Jews

• Christians

• Muslims

• Hindus

Where is the creation story written for Christians and Jews?

Organize these options into the right categories

Groups:

(a) Literalist

,

(b) Conservatist

,

(c) Liberalist

,

(d) Atheist

• God inspired the creasion story

• God of the gaps, Freud

• Is not 100% factual; crucially god created everything

• God created the world is 6 days exactly

• Story teller needed a story and people started to believe it

• God created science

• The creation story is historical and factual

• God created the world but not how the bible said it. It's a story to teach god's goodness. God

Match the following

• Teleogical argument

• William Paley

• Atheist

• Charles Darwin

• Theory of evolution

• A. C Grayling

Which is a disadvantage and advantage of the teleogical/design argument?

Groups:

(a) Advantages

,

(b) Disadvantages

• If it was designed, why do natural disasters happen

• There is evidence for design eg. Laws of nature, physics

• Evolution explains how things are adapted and changed

• Why must god be the designer of the world

• There is a low chance that the world was created naturally

• Fits with religious beliefs about god

the ___ ____ theory is how scientists believe the world came to be. It involves an explosion that created the world.

The _________ theory was written by Charles Darwin and explains how species changed and developed over time.

What are some liberal and literal views about the big bang and evolution theory?

Groups:

(a) Literal

,

(b) Liberal

• God and science cannot co-exist

• God and science can co-exist

• the bible is not 100% factual

• God planted the proof of evolution as a test of faith

• God created science and evolution to help him create the world

• It is a test from god and a disrespect to doubt the creation story

______ is the ability to think things through

Organize these options into the right categories

Groups:

(a) Rationalism

,

(b) Empiricism

• Knowledge through reason and knowledge

• Reason through sensation and experience