Bell Ringer 08/13/24

The Future of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been heralded as the next great leap in technology, with potential applications ranging from healthcare to autonomous vehicles. In the early stages of development, AI was primarily seen as a tool to perform repetitive tasks more efficiently than humans. However, as the technology has advanced, the scope of AI has broadened significantly.

Critics argue that AI's rapid development poses ethical challenges, particularly concerning privacy and job displacement. The author's central claim is that while AI has the potential to revolutionize industries, its implementation must be carefully managed to mitigate these risks. This claim is supported by examples of AI's positive impacts, such as in medical diagnostics, and by cautionary tales of job losses in manufacturing sectors. The author further refines the claim by discussing the role of regulatory frameworks in ensuring that AI benefits society as a whole, not just a select few.

How does the author refine the central claim about AI’s potential and its associated risks throughout the text?

• By presenting an initial, unqualified endorsement of AI before acknowledging potential drawbacks.

• By initially focusing on the ethical challenges of AI and then dismissing these concerns in favor of technological progress.

• By balancing the discussion between AI’s revolutionary potential and the importance of regulatory frameworks.

• By outlining the negative impacts of AI first and concluding with a pessimistic view on its future.

The Future of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been heralded as the next great leap in technology, with potential applications ranging from healthcare to autonomous vehicles. In the early stages of development, AI was primarily seen as a tool to perform repetitive tasks more efficiently than humans. However, as the technology has advanced, the scope of AI has broadened significantly.

Critics argue that AI's rapid development poses ethical challenges, particularly concerning privacy and job displacement. The author's central claim is that while AI has the potential to revolutionize industries, its implementation must be carefully managed to mitigate these risks. This claim is supported by examples of AI's positive impacts, such as in medical diagnostics, and by cautionary tales of job losses in manufacturing sectors. The author further refines the claim by discussing the role of regulatory frameworks in ensuring that AI benefits society as a whole, not just a select few.

Question: In what way does the author use the examples of AI in medical diagnostics and job displacement to develop the central claim?

• The author presents these examples as contradictory evidence to challenge the central claim.

• The author uses these examples to illustrate both the positive and negative impacts of AI, thereby refining the central claim.

• The author briefly mentions these examples without integrating them into the overall argument.

• The author focuses solely on the positive impact of AI in medical diagnostics, ignoring the issue of job displacement.

The Future of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been heralded as the next great leap in technology, with potential applications ranging from healthcare to autonomous vehicles. In the early stages of development, AI was primarily seen as a tool to perform repetitive tasks more efficiently than humans. However, as the technology has advanced, the scope of AI has broadened significantly.

Critics argue that AI's rapid development poses ethical challenges, particularly concerning privacy and job displacement. The author's central claim is that while AI has the potential to revolutionize industries, its implementation must be carefully managed to mitigate these risks. This claim is supported by examples of AI's positive impacts, such as in medical diagnostics, and by cautionary tales of job losses in manufacturing sectors. The author further refines the claim by discussing the role of regulatory frameworks in ensuring that AI benefits society as a whole, not just a select few.

How does the author’s discussion of regulatory frameworks contribute to the refinement of the central claim in the final paragraph?

• It introduces a new claim that contradicts the central idea presented earlier in the text.

• It strengthens the central claim by providing a solution to the ethical challenges associated with AI.

• It shifts the focus away from the central claim, leading to a less cohesive argument.

• It weakens the central claim by suggesting that AI’s potential benefits are unattainable.