
Exploring Justice in Twelve Angry Men
Authored by Becki Recker
English
10th Grade
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking covered

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
15 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Analyze the motivation behind Juror 8's decision to vote "not guilty" in the initial vote.
He wants to be the center of attention.
He believes in the boy's innocence without any doubt.
He wants to ensure a fair discussion before making a final decision.
He dislikes the other jurors and wants to oppose them.
Tags
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Evaluate the significance of the knife presented as evidence in the trial.
It is the only piece of evidence that directly links the boy to the crime.
It is a common type of knife that could belong to anyone.
It was found at the crime scene with the boy's fingerprints.
It was a unique knife that only the boy could have owned.
Tags
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Interpret the theme of justice as depicted in "Twelve Angry Men."
Justice is portrayed as a flawed system that often fails.
Justice is shown as a process that requires careful deliberation and moral courage.
Justice is depicted as a straightforward and easy-to-achieve goal.
Justice is shown as irrelevant to the jurors' personal biases.
Tags
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Discuss the moral dilemma faced by Juror 3 in the play.
He must choose between his personal vendetta and the truth.
He struggles with the decision to convict an innocent boy to save his own reputation.
He is torn between his duty as a juror and his fear of the other jurors.
He must decide whether to reveal a secret that could change the outcome of the trial.
Tags
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Assess the group dynamics that influence the jury's decision-making process.
The group is cohesive and works together without conflict.
The group is divided, with strong personalities influencing the weaker ones.
The group relies solely on factual evidence without any personal biases.
The group is indifferent and makes decisions quickly without much discussion.
Tags
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Analyze the role of Juror 9 in changing the course of the deliberations.
He remains silent and does not contribute to the discussions.
He supports Juror 8 by providing critical insights and observations.
He sides with the majority to avoid conflict.
He tries to rush the decision to end the deliberations quickly.
Tags
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Evaluate the reliability of the old man's testimony in the trial.
It is completely reliable and leaves no room for doubt.
It is questionable due to inconsistencies and physical limitations.
It is dismissed by all jurors as irrelevant.
It is the most crucial piece of evidence in the trial.
Tags
DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?