Identifying Common Logical Fallacies

What is circular reasoning often characterized by?

• Using unrelated evidence

• Restating the argument as proof

• Providing strong empirical data

• Using multiple sources

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What does a hasty generalization typically involve?

• Ignoring obvious evidence

• Using well-supported evidence

• Careful consideration of all facts

• Drawing conclusions from limited data

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is the main issue with slippery slope arguments?

• They encourage detailed analysis

• They are based on strong foundational facts

• They rely on extreme hypothetical outcomes

• They use clear logical steps

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

How does a straw man fallacy typically distort an argument?

• By misrepresenting the opponent's position

• By providing additional supporting evidence

• By simplifying the opponent's argument

• By addressing the actual point made

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is a common tactic in an ad hominem attack?

• Providing counterarguments to the opponent's claims

• Attacking the opponent's character to undermine their argument

• Focusing solely on the logical structure of the argument

• Supporting the opponent's argument with additional data

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What does a false dichotomy typically present?

• Multiple valid alternatives

• Only two extreme options

• A balanced view of all possible outcomes

• Detailed evidence for each position

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is the main flaw in using an appeal to emotion?

• It considers all relevant aspects of the argument

• It distracts from the factual basis with emotional appeal

• It uses statistical data effectively

• It provides a logical basis for the argument

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

What is the issue with equivocation in arguments?

• It is based on strong empirical evidence

• It provides a detailed analysis of the topic

• It uses clear and consistent definitions

• It involves ambiguous or shifting terms

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Why is a bandwagon appeal considered weak?

• It relies on popular opinion rather than facts

• It considers all sides of an argument

• It is based on logical reasoning

• It uses strong empirical evidence

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

What is wrong with using a false analogy?

• It uses strong supporting evidence

• It compares things that are fundamentally similar

• It is based on trivial similarities

• It provides a detailed comparison

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1