Exploring Twelve Angry Men

Exploring Twelve Angry Men

12th Grade

18 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Quiz over Courtroom Professionals

Quiz over Courtroom Professionals

12th Grade

20 Qs

12th grade quizz

12th grade quizz

10th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

Review: Counterclaim & Rebuttal Quiz (Due 2/8/21)

Review: Counterclaim & Rebuttal Quiz (Due 2/8/21)

9th - 12th Grade

18 Qs

12 Angry Men - Act 1

12 Angry Men - Act 1

12th Grade

19 Qs

Creative Writing Week 15 Review

Creative Writing Week 15 Review

9th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

Academic Vocabulary

Academic Vocabulary

9th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

Subject Verb Agreement Practice

Subject Verb Agreement Practice

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

SVA - Level 2

SVA - Level 2

7th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

Exploring Twelve Angry Men

Exploring Twelve Angry Men

Assessment

Quiz

English

12th Grade

Easy

CCSS
RL.11-12.3, RL.9-10.3, RL.5.6

+18

Standards-aligned

Created by

נועה שחר

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

18 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 6 pts

What motivates Juror 8 to advocate for the defendant?

A desire for personal gain.

A belief that the defendant is guilty.

A strong sense of justice and belief in reasonable doubt.

A wish to impress the other jurors.

Answer explanation

Juror 8 is motivated by a strong sense of justice and a belief in reasonable doubt, advocating for the defendant because he feels it is essential to thoroughly consider the evidence before reaching a verdict.

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.3

CCSS.RL.6.3

CCSS.RL.7.6

CCSS.RL.8.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 6 pts

Identify a key theme in the play and explain its significance.

The importance of Leadership.

The role of fate in human lives.

The importance of reasonable doubt.

The effectiveness of a jury trial.

Answer explanation

The importance of reasonable doubt is a key theme as it underscores the principle that a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. This theme highlights the necessity of careful deliberation in the pursuit of justice.

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.11-12.3

CCSS.RL.8.3

CCSS.RL.9-10.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10. RL.11-12.10

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 6 pts

Evaluate the effectiveness of Juror 3's arguments throughout the play.

Juror 3's arguments are largely ineffective due to personal bias and emotional reasoning.

Juror 3's arguments are always logical and well-structured.

Juror 3's points are based on objective evidence and facts.

Juror 3 effectively sways the opinions of other jurors.

Answer explanation

Juror 3's arguments are largely ineffective because they stem from personal bias and emotional reasoning, rather than objective analysis. This undermines his credibility and fails to convince other jurors.

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.3

CCSS.RL.6.6

CCSS.RL.7.6

CCSS.RL.8.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 6 pts

What subtext can be interpreted from the dialogue between Juror 4 and Juror 8?

The exchange suggests that emotions should override logical reasoning in court.

The conversation highlights the need for a unanimous verdict regardless of evidence.

The dialogue illustrates the tension between logic and empathy in the pursuit of justice.

The dialogue emphasizes the importance of personal biases in decision-making.

Answer explanation

The dialogue between Juror 4 and Juror 8 reveals a conflict between rational analysis and emotional understanding, highlighting how both elements are crucial in achieving a fair verdict in the justice system.

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.11-12.3

CCSS.RL.8.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10. RL.11-12.10

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

Discuss the moral dilemma faced by the jurors in their decision-making process.

The jurors prioritize their personal relationships over the case.

The moral dilemma involves balancing personal beliefs with the obligation to uphold justice.

The jurors only consider the evidence presented in court.

The jurors are solely influenced by public opinion.

Answer explanation

The correct choice highlights the jurors' struggle to reconcile their personal beliefs with their duty to deliver a fair verdict, emphasizing the complexity of moral decision-making in the pursuit of justice.

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.3

CCSS.RL.6.3

CCSS.RL.7.3

CCSS.RL.8.3

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

Compare the perspectives of Juror 8 and Juror 3 regarding the evidence presented.

Juror 8 believes the evidence is overwhelming, while Juror 3 questions its validity.

Juror 8 values reasonable doubt and thorough analysis of evidence, while Juror 3 relies on personal bias and believes the evidence is conclusive.

Juror 8 dismisses the evidence without consideration, while Juror 3 seeks to understand it better.

Juror 8 focuses solely on emotional appeals, while Juror 3 analyzes the facts critically.

Answer explanation

Juror 8 emphasizes the importance of reasonable doubt and careful examination of the evidence, while Juror 3 is influenced by personal bias and considers the evidence to be definitive, highlighting their contrasting viewpoints.

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.9

CCSS.RL.6.3

CCSS.RL.7.3

CCSS.RL.8.3

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

What is the most pivotal event that shifts the jury's decision?

A juror's personal bias

Introduction of new evidence

The defendant's emotional testimony

A change in the judge's instructions

Answer explanation

The introduction of new evidence is crucial as it can directly impact the jury's perception of the case, potentially leading to a shift in their decision. Other factors may influence, but new evidence is often the most decisive.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?