MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

University

8 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Types of Sources Quiz

Types of Sources Quiz

12th Grade - University

10 Qs

 The writing processes of English1.

The writing processes of English1.

4th Grade - University

11 Qs

Find the main idea 1

Find the main idea 1

University

10 Qs

Academic Writing

Academic Writing

10th Grade - Professional Development

10 Qs

Vocabulary Quiz 8

Vocabulary Quiz 8

6th Grade - University

10 Qs

Main Ideas, Themes

Main Ideas, Themes

University

10 Qs

[THINHTHG] REVIEW - UNIT 1

[THINHTHG] REVIEW - UNIT 1

2nd Grade - University

8 Qs

Traumatic injuries

Traumatic injuries

University

10 Qs

MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

Assessment

Quiz

English

University

Hard

Created by

JH Chan

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

8 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Idea units

(1) ______________ (In...) test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

2.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units

In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret (2) ______________ less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

3.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units (3) _____ _________ (be) either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

4.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) (4)_________ 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

5.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any (5)______ ____ ___________ with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

6.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units (6) _____ ________ the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

7.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 (7) _______ samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

8.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment (8) ______their essential and secondary idea units _______ (identify).