MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

Quiz
•
English
•
University
•
Hard
JH Chan
Used 1+ times
FREE Resource
8 questions
Show all answers
1.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
Idea units
(1) ______________ (In...) test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
2.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret (2) ______________ less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
3.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units (3) _____ _________ (be) either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
4.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) (4)_________ 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
5.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any (5)______ ____ ___________ with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
6.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units (6) _____ ________ the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
7.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 (7) _______ samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
8.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment (8) ______their essential and secondary idea units _______ (identify).
Similar Resources on Wayground
10 questions
Main Ideas, Themes

Quiz
•
University
10 questions
Critical Reading and Writing

Quiz
•
University
12 questions
PARTS OF SPEECH

Quiz
•
University
10 questions
Exploring Chapter 18 Themes

Quiz
•
10th Grade - University
10 questions
Traumatic injuries

Quiz
•
University
10 questions
Types of Sources Quiz

Quiz
•
12th Grade - University
10 questions
Literal, Inferential, and Critical Reading Quiz

Quiz
•
University
10 questions
Language 1.1

Quiz
•
University
Popular Resources on Wayground
10 questions
SR&R 2025-2026 Practice Quiz

Quiz
•
6th - 8th Grade
30 questions
Review of Grade Level Rules WJH

Quiz
•
6th - 8th Grade
6 questions
PRIDE in the Hallways and Bathrooms

Lesson
•
12th Grade
10 questions
Lab Safety Procedures and Guidelines

Interactive video
•
6th - 10th Grade
10 questions
Nouns, nouns, nouns

Quiz
•
3rd Grade
25 questions
Multiplication Facts

Quiz
•
5th Grade
11 questions
All about me

Quiz
•
Professional Development
15 questions
Subtracting Integers

Quiz
•
7th Grade