Search Header Logo

Terms of a Contract II

Authored by Pavithra Gopalakrishnan

Philosophy

12th Grade

Used 1+ times

 Terms of a Contract II
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

8 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a condition in a contract?

A term that can be broken without significant consequences

A term that is implied by law

A term that is essential and a breach has significant effects

A term that is always written in the contract

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does a warranty allow in the event of a breach?

The contract is automatically void

The party can sue for damages but not repudiate the contract

The contract can be rescinded immediately

The party must continue to perform their obligations

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the case of Associated Metal Smelters Ltd v Tham Cheow Toh, what was the main issue?

Whether the contract was signed

Whether the plaintiff paid the correct amount

Whether the defendants had a valid counter-claim

Whether the furnace could reach the required temperature

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is an exclusion clause?

A clause that must be written in large print

A clause that is always enforceable

A clause that restricts or modifies liability

A clause that allows for unlimited liability

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What must be true for an exclusion clause to be incorporated into a contract?

It must be written in bold letters

It must be verbally agreed upon

It must be included in a document where terms are normally found

It must be signed by both parties

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the case of Olley v Marlborough Court Ltd, why was the exclusion clause not valid?

It was not signed by the plaintiff

The notice was given after the contract was formed

The hotel did not have a valid license

The clause was not written clearly

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the court rule in Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co regarding misrepresentation?

The exclusion clause was valid

The exclusion clause could not be relied upon due to misrepresentation

The plaintiff was at fault for not reading the clause

The case was dismissed

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?