Makeup Quiz 5

What is the significance of the summons in initiating a lawsuit and establishing jurisdiction over the defendant?

• It notifies the defendant of the legal proceedings against them.

• It establishes the court’s jurisdiction over the defendant.

• It provides the defendant an opportunity to defend themselves.

• Without proper service of a summons, the court may not have jurisdiction, and the case may be dismissed.

Answer explanation

The summons plays a crucial role in initiating a lawsuit and establishing jurisdiction over the defendant. It ensures that the defendant is aware of the legal proceedings against them and has an opportunity to defend themselves. Without proper service of a summons, the court may not have jurisdiction over the defendant, and the case may be dismissed.

Marie filed a complaint against Jason for breach of contract in the Regional Trial Court (RTC). After filing the complaint, Marie discovered additional facts and decided to amend her complaint to include a claim for damages resulting from the breach. Jason had already been served with the original summons and had filed his answer. Is a new summons required for the amended complaint?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

A new summons is not required for the amended complaint because the amendment does not substantially change the cause of action or the identity of the defendant. The original summons remains sufficient as the nature of the claim and the parties involved have not materially altered. Jason has already been properly notified of the lawsuit and has responded, so the court can proceed with the amended complaint without issuing a new summons.

In this scenario, the claim for damages is directly related to the original breach of contract claim and does not introduce a new cause of action or change the identity of the defendant. Therefore, it is generally not seen as a substantial change that would require a new summons. The original summons remains sufficient because the core issue—the breach of contract—remains the same, and the defendant has already been notified of the lawsuit.

Is personal service of a summons always required? If not, under what circumstances can substituted service be used?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

Personal service is generally preferred, but substituted service may be allowed in certain circumstances, such as when the defendant cannot be found after diligent attempts at personal service.

What are the consequences of refusing to receive a summons?

• The summons is considered not served, and the case cannot proceed.

• The summons is still considered served if left at the defendant’s usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and discretion.

• The defendant can avoid the lawsuit by refusing to accept the summons.

• The court will dismiss the case if the defendant refuses to receive the summons.

Answer explanation

Refusing to receive a summons does not prevent it from being considered served. If the defendant refuses to accept the summons, the person attempting to serve it can leave the summons at the defendant's usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and discretion.

Liza filed a complaint against Mark for breach of contract in the Regional Trial Court (RTC). The court issued a summons, which was served by a process server. The return of service stated the date of service and the method of service only. Is the return of service valid?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

A return of service is a document filed with the court that confirms that the summons was served on the defendant. It typically includes:

• Date of service: The date when the summons was served.

• Method of service: How the summons was served (e.g., personal service, substituted service).

• Name of the person who served the summons: The name of the individual who served the summons.

• Place of service: The location where the summons was served.

The return of service is void since it failed to include the name of the person who served the summons and the place of service. This omission renders the return of service invalid, and the court may require proper service to be effected and documented before proceeding with the case.

Does the 30-calendar day period from the issuance and receipt of the summons presuppose that substituted service may only be resorted to after this period?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

No, the 30-calendar day period does not presuppose that substituted service can only be used after this time. Substituted service can be employed as soon as it becomes apparent that personal service is impracticable. The server should make reasonable attempts at personal service, but there's no fixed waiting period before resorting to substituted service. The key is demonstrating that personal service was genuinely attempted and found to be impracticable.

Why is leave of court necessary for extraterritorial service of summons?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

Leave of court is necessary for extraterritorial service because:

1. 1. It ensures that the court has jurisdiction over the subject matter

2. 2. It allows the court to verify that extraterritorial service is appropriate and necessary

3. 3. It provides an opportunity for the court to specify the manner of service

4. 4. It helps prevent abuse of process and ensures due diligence in attempting service

The court's oversight in this process helps maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings.

Ayesha filed a complaint for annulment of marriage against Benito, who had moved abroad and could not be located. The court allowed service of summons by publication. The summons was published in a local newspaper. The return of service filed with the court included an affidavit from the newspaper’s advertising manager and a copy of the published summons. Is the service of summons by publication valid?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

Service of summons by publication is proven through the following:

    1) Affidavit of the printer, his foreman or principal clerk, or the editor, business or advertising manager of the newspaper where the summons was published.

    2) Copy of the published summons as it appeared in the newspaper.

    3) Affidavit of mailing of a copy of the summons and the order for its publication to the defendant at their last known address.

The service of summons by publication is invalid because the return of service failed to include the affidavit of mailing a copy of the summons and the order for its publication to Ben at his last known address. This omission means that the court cannot consider the service of summons as properly effected, and Ayesha may need to rectify this by ensuring all required documents are submitted to validate the service of summons by publication.

Anna filed a specific performance case against Elsa in the Municipal Trial Court (MTC) of Cavite City. Since Anna was going abroad for an extended period, she decided to voluntarily dismiss the case. After six (6) months, she decided to refile this case, this time in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila. Due to a missing evidence, Anna decided to again voluntarily dismiss the case. Later, having discovered her missing evidence, Anna refiled the case with the RTC of Manila. Elsa moved to dismiss the case under the two-dismissal rule. Decide.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

In Two-Dismissal Rule, one of the requisites is that the court that dismisses the case must have proper jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties involved. If the court lacks jurisdiction, the dismissal is not valid and does not count towards the two-dismissal rule. Here, since the MTC has no jurisdiction in a specific performance case, first dismissal is not valid, and the two-dismissal rule does not apply.

Why is the losing party not required to file a comment in a Motion for Execution?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

A losing party is not required to comment on a Motion for Execution because the judgment is already final and executory, making the issuance of a writ of execution a ministerial duty of the court. This ensures efficiency and prevents unnecessary delays in enforcing the judgment.